Yahong Xue1, Shuqing Ding, Yijiang Ding, Fei Liu. 1. The National Chinese Medicine Center of Colorectal Diseases, Department of Anorectal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210001, China. njgczx@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of two-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (2D-EAUS) and three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the diagnosis of perianal fistulas. METHODS: Image data of 47 perianal fistula patients undergoing surgery in our department between January 2012 and December 2012 were collected. All the patients underwent 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS, and the results were compared to intraoperative findings (gold standard) by kappa concordance test. RESULTS: Both 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS showed good concordance with intraoperative findings in internal opening (kappa: 0.776 vs. 0.636). 3D-EAUS had better concordance with intraoperative finding in the diagnosis of intersphincteric, high transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas as compared to 2D-EAUS (kappa: 0.810 vs. 0.592, kappa: 0.863 vs. 0.548, kappa: 1.000 vs. 0.672). 3D-EAUS showed better concordance with intraoperative findings in secondary tract compared to 2D-EAUS(kappa: 0.659 vs. 0.535). Both 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS had good concordance with intraoperative findings in complicated abscesses (kappa: 0.881 vs. 0.816). CONCLUSION: 3D-EAUS can show the relationship of fistula with anal sphincter, especially in diagnosing high fistula and fistula with secondary tracts, and has a higher diagnostic accuracy than 2D-EAUS.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of two-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (2D-EAUS) and three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the diagnosis of perianal fistulas. METHODS: Image data of 47 perianal fistulapatients undergoing surgery in our department between January 2012 and December 2012 were collected. All the patients underwent 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS, and the results were compared to intraoperative findings (gold standard) by kappa concordance test. RESULTS: Both 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS showed good concordance with intraoperative findings in internal opening (kappa: 0.776 vs. 0.636). 3D-EAUS had better concordance with intraoperative finding in the diagnosis of intersphincteric, high transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas as compared to 2D-EAUS (kappa: 0.810 vs. 0.592, kappa: 0.863 vs. 0.548, kappa: 1.000 vs. 0.672). 3D-EAUS showed better concordance with intraoperative findings in secondary tract compared to 2D-EAUS(kappa: 0.659 vs. 0.535). Both 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS had good concordance with intraoperative findings in complicated abscesses (kappa: 0.881 vs. 0.816). CONCLUSION: 3D-EAUS can show the relationship of fistula with anal sphincter, especially in diagnosing high fistula and fistula with secondary tracts, and has a higher diagnostic accuracy than 2D-EAUS.