Literature DB >> 25529524

A call for greater power in an era of publishing negative results.

Anna L Oberhofer1, Robert P Lennon2.   

Abstract

Historically, medical journals published only positive results from experimentation. With the growth of electronic media, many journals are now able to publish negative results as well. Because most medical experiments are designed to have different thresholds of significance for positive and negative results, this can lead readers to misunderstand the level of significance of a published negative result. We propose a technical shift - setting α equal to β - to avoid this potential for misunderstanding.
Copyright © 2014 by Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25529524     DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Acad        ISSN: 1840-1848


  1 in total

Review 1.  Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results.

Authors:  Ana Mlinarić; Martina Horvat; Vesna Šupak Smolčić
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.