| Literature DB >> 25529476 |
Gustav Holmgren1, Jane Synnergren2, Yalda Bogestål3, Caroline Améen4, Karolina Åkesson5, Sandra Holmgren6, Anders Lindahl7, Peter Sartipy8.
Abstract
Doxorubicin is a chemotherapeutic agent indicated for the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including leukaemia, lymphomas, and many solid tumours. The use of doxorubicin is, however, associated with severe cardiotoxicity, often resulting in early discontinuation of the treatment. Importantly, the toxic symptoms can occur several years after the termination of the doxorubicin administration. In this study, the toxic effects of doxorubicin exposure have been investigated in cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESC). The cells were exposed to different concentrations of doxorubicin for up to 2 days, followed by a 12 day recovery period. Notably, the cell morphology was altered during drug treatment and the cells showed a reduced contractile ability, most prominent at the highest concentration of doxorubicin at the later time points. A general cytotoxic response measured as Lactate dehydrogenase leakage was observed after 2 days' exposure compared to the vehicle control, but this response was absent during the recovery period. A similar dose-dependant pattern was observed for the release of cardiac specific troponin T (cTnT) after 1 day and 2 days of treatment with doxorubicin. Global transcriptional profiles in the cells revealed clusters of genes that were differentially expressed during doxorubicin exposure, a pattern that in some cases was sustained even throughout the recovery period, suggesting that these genes could be used as sensitive biomarkers for doxorubicin-induced toxicity in human cardiomyocytes. The results from this study show that cTnT release can be used as a measurement of acute cardiotoxicity due to doxorubicin. However, for the late onset of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy, cTnT release might not be the most optimal biomarker. As an alternative, some of the genes that we identified as differentially expressed after doxorubicin exposure could serve as more relevant biomarkers, and may also help to explain the cellular mechanisms behind the late onset apoptosis associated with doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Cardiomyocytes; Doxorubicin; Human pluripotent stem cells; Toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25529476 PMCID: PMC4326176 DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.12.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicology ISSN: 0300-483X Impact factor: 4.221
Fig. 1Study outline. The figure displays a schematic overview of the study outline.
Fig. 2Characterization of Cellartis® Pure hES-CM at day 4 post-thawing (i.e., start of doxorubicin treatment) (A) light microscopy image (20× magnification) displaying the morphology of the pure hES-CM. (B) Immunocytochemistry staining of cTnT (red) and DAPI (blue). (C) Immunocytochemistry staining of Nkx2.5 (red) and DAPI (blue). (D) Immunocytochemistry staining of MLC2a (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar for all images = 50 μm. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Morphological images of Cellartis® Pure hES-CM during doxorubicin treatment. The images display the morphological changes seen upon doxorubicin exposure. The upper panel shows untreated cells at day 1 (A), day 2 (B), day 7 (C), and day 14 (D), while the lower panel shows the 450 nM doxorubicin treatment group at day 1 (E), day 2 (F), day 7 (G), and day 14 (H). Scale bar for all images = 50 μm.
Fig. 4Toxicity evaluation using cTnT and LDH measurements. Measurements of LDH (A) and cTnT (B) release (see Section 2 for details) from five different batches (assayed in triplicates) of cardiomyocytes exposed to doxorubicin at various concentrations. The bar graph shows the mean values of the fold change related to the baseline values at day 0 and the error bars illustrate the SEM (* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01).
Fig. 5Global hierarchical clustering of the microarray data. Dendrogram of the mean expression values from three replicated samples, displaying a separation of all samples into six distinct clusters.
Fig. 6Analysis of gene expression profiles. (A) Gene expression profile analysis, using the HCE3.5 software, of all transcripts with an FC ≥ 2 between exposed samples and untreated control. The red line represents a target gene profile while the black lines represent the genes with a Pearson correlation coefficient r > 0.9. (B) HCE3.5 software image the gene expression profile of GDF15 (red line) together with the expression profiles of five similarly expressed genes (black lines). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Affected pathways due to doxorubicin exposure. List of over-represented pathways identified using ConsensusPathDB and the differentially expressed genes.
| Genes in pathway | Overlap with candidate list | Pathway source | Differentially expressed genes in pathway | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct p53 effectors | 142 | 11 (7.7%) | 1.30E-10 | PID | |
| Validated transcriptional targets of TAp63 isoforms | 55 | 8 (14.5%) | 3.75E-10 | PID | |
| p53 Signalling pathway – homo sapiens (human) | 68 | 7 (10.3%) | 5.60E-08 | KEGG | |
| DNA damage response | 67 | 6 (9.0%) | 1.23E-06 | Wikipathways | |
| miRNA regulation of DNA Damage response | 97 | 6 (6.2%) | 8.94E-06 | Wikipathways | |
| p73 Transcription factor network | 79 | 5 (6.4%) | 4.68E-05 | PID | |
| FoxO signalling pathway – homo sapiens (human) | 133 | 5 (3.8%) | 0.00052 | KEGG | |
| Cellular senescence | 183 | 5 (2.7%) | 0.00196 | Reactome | |
| Viral carcinogenesis – homo sapiens (human) | 206 | 5 (2.4%) | 0.00296 | KEGG | |
| Cellular responses to stress | 269 | 5 (1.9%) | 0.00849 | Reactome | |
| Neuronal system | 277 | 5 (1.8%) | 0.00873 | Reactome |
Fig. 7Protein-protein interaction network of GDF15. The STRING search tool was used to generate a protein-protein interaction network using the target gene GDF15. Green arrows = activation, red lines = inhibition, blue lines = binding, pink lines = post-translational modification, yellow lines = expression interaction. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 8Gene expression of GDF15. The graph shows the expression of GDF15 and five other genes, identified with the HCE3.5 software, showing similar gene expression as GDF15. Results are reported as mean expression values (n = 3) from the microarray data, each run in triplicate, with error bars representing the SEM.