Literature DB >> 25529469

The use of moderate sedation for the secondary prevention of adverse vasovagal reactions.

David J Kennedy1, Byron Schneider, Matthew Smuck, Christopher T Plastaras.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions can occur with spine procedures and may result in premature procedure termination or other adverse events.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if moderate sedation is an effective means of secondary prevention for vasovagal reactions.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data on 6,364 consecutive spine injections.
RESULTS: Of the 6,364 spine injections, 6,150 spine injections were done without moderate sedation and resulted in 205 vasovagal reactions (3.3% [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.9-3.8%]). One hundred thirty-four spine procedures were performed on patients that had a history of prior vasovagal reaction during a spine procedure. Of these, 90 procedures were performed without moderate sedation, and 21/90 (23.3% [95% CI 15.2-32.1%]) were complicated by a repeat vasovagal reaction. None of 44 repeat injections that utilized moderate sedation experienced a repeat vasovagal reaction (0% [95% CI 0-9.6%]) (χ(2)  = 12.17, P < 0.00048). The rate of vasovagal reaction in patients with a history of prior reaction undergoing repeat injection without conscious sedation was significantly higher (23.3% [95% CI 15.2-32.1%]) than the rate in patients with no such history (3.0% [95% CI 2.6-3.5%] [χ(2)  = 113.4, P < 1.78E-26]).
CONCLUSIONS: A history of vasovagal reaction is a strong predictor of experiencing a vasovagal reaction on subsequent procedures. No vasovagal reactions occurred with the use of moderate sedation, including in the 44 injections in patients that had a history of vasovagal reaction during spine procedures. The overall low rate of vasovagal reactions is low, and greater benefits of moderate sedation were observed when utilized as secondary prevention of repeat vasovagal reactions. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Block; Epidural (Injection Space); Facet Joint; Fluoroscopy; Safety; Sedation; Spine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25529469     DOI: 10.1111/pme.12632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  4 in total

1.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 3.  Vasovagal Reactions during Interventional Pain Management Procedures-A Review of Pathophysiology, Incidence, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management.

Authors:  Brian Malave; Bruce Vrooman
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25

4.  Characterization of an Artificial Liver Support System-Related Vasovagal Reaction.

Authors:  Shanshan Ma; Zhongyang Xie; Huafen Zhang; Jiangcheng Rong; Lingjian Zhang; Ya Yang; He Jiang; Xiaowei Xu; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.