Literature DB >> 25528939

Assessment of differences in psychosocial resources and state of health of rural and urban residents--based on studies carried out on students during examination stress.

Danuta Zarzycka1, Barbara Ślusarska2, Ludmiła Marcinowicz3, Irena Wrońska2, Maria Kózka4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Civilization changes of the environment shaping the psychosocial resources from rural to urban influence human health. AIM: The study aimed to identify the differences due to the place of residence (rural, urban) as far as health resources are concerned (social support, sense of coherence, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentration in plasma) and health in examination stress situations. The study also determined the concentration of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (health resource) and cortisol (stress indicator).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The psychosocial variables were assessed using the scales: ISEL-48v. Coll., SOC-29, SF-36v.2™ o and analogue scale (perception of examination stress). The study included, based on a stratified sampling (year of study) and purposive sampling (written examination, major), 731 students representing the six universities in Lublin, south-east Poland. Among the respondents, 130 students were rural residents.
RESULTS: Health resources of students living in rural and urban areas generally differ statistically significantly in social support and the subscales of availability of tangible support, availability of appreciative support, the availability of cognitive-evaluative support and a sense of resourcefulness. The study recorded a sstatistically significantly larger network of family ties among students living in rural areas. The demonstrated diversity of resources did not substantially affect the perceived health, with the exception of pain sensation. Examination stress assessed by subjective opinion of the respondents and plasma cortisol levels vary relative to the place of residence. Students residing in rural areas showed significantly lower cortisol levels values, but subjectively perceived the situation of examation as more stressful.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in health resources and their mechanism of impact on health, to a limited extent, were conditioned by the place of residence, but they are so important in the light of human choices that they require further analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25528939     DOI: 10.5604/12321966.1129952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med        ISSN: 1232-1966            Impact factor:   1.447


  4 in total

1.  Factors determining chance of type 2 diabetes remission after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a nationwide cohort study in 8057 Swedish patients.

Authors:  Erik Stenberg; Torsten Olbers; Yang Cao; Magnus Sundbom; Anders Jans; Johan Ottosson; Erik Naslund; Ingmar Näslund
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-05

2.  Comment on Mroczek et al. Evaluation of Quality of Life of Those Living near a Wind Farm. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 6066-6083.

Authors:  Daniel Shepherd
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Association between chronic conditions and health-related quality of life: differences by level of urbanization in Peru.

Authors:  Alvaro Taype-Rondan; Elizabeth Sarah Abbs; Maria Lazo-Porras; William Checkley; Robert H Gilman; Liam Smeeth; J Jaime Miranda; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The association between socioeconomic factors and weight loss 5 years after gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Erik Stenberg; Ingmar Näslund; Carina Persson; Eva Szabo; Magnus Sundbom; Johan Ottosson; Erik Näslund
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.095

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.