Literature DB >> 25528932

Effects of aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise programme on aerobic and anaerobic capacity, somatic features and blood lipid profile in collegate females.

Krzystof Mazurek1, Krzysztof Krawczyk2, Piotr Zmijewski3, Henryk Norkowski1, Anna Czajkowska1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity has many positive health benefits, including reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases and some cancers, as well as improving the quality of life. objectives. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of 8-week aerobic interval cycle exercise training (AIT) compared to continuous cycle exercises of moderate intensity (CME) on the aerobic and anaerobic capacity, somatic features and lipid profile.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The research was conducted in 88 volunteers aged 19.5±0.6 years, who were randomized to three groups of organized physical activity (OPA), who exercised 3 times per week in 47 min sessions: (I) AIT (n=24) comprising 2 series of 6x10 s sprinting with maximal pedalling cadence and active rest pedalling with intensity 65%-75% HRmax, (II) CME (n=22) corresponding to 65%-75% HRmax, (III) regular collegiate physical education classes of programmed exercises (CON; n=42). Before and after OPA anthropometrics, aero- and anaerobic capacity and lipid profile indices were measured.
RESULTS: In AIT, a significantly greater decrease of waist circumference and WHR was noted when compared to CON, and a significantly greater reduction of sum of skinfolds than in CON and CME. Improvement in relative and absolute VO2max (L/min and ml/kg/min) was significantly higher in AIT than CON. Work output and peak power output in the anaerobic test improved significantly in AIT, CME and CON, but independently of training type. OPA was effective only in reducing triglyceride concentrations in CME and CON groups, without interaction effects in relation to training type.
CONCLUSION: It was found that 8 weeks of OPA was beneficial in improving somatic and aerobic capacity indices, but AIT resulted in the greatest improvement in somatic indices (waist circumference, WHR, sum of skinfolds) and in VO2max, compared to CME and CON programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25528932     DOI: 10.5604/12321966.1129949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med        ISSN: 1232-1966            Impact factor:   1.447


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachelle N Sultana; Angelo Sabag; Shelley E Keating; Nathan A Johnson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  High intensity interval and moderate continuous cycle training in a physical education programme improves health-related fitness in young females.

Authors:  K Mazurek; P Zmijewski; K Krawczyk; A Czajkowska; A Kęska; P Kapuściński; T Mazurek
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.806

3.  Soccer vs. running training effects in young adult men: which programme is more effective in improvement of body composition? Randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Z Milanović; S Pantelić; R Kostić; N Trajković; G Sporiš
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.806

4.  Benefits of Regular Exercise on Inflammatory and Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Normal Weight, Overweight and Obese Adults.

Authors:  Olivia Santos Gondim; Vinicius Tadeu Nunes de Camargo; Fernanda Almeida Gutierrez; Patricia Fátima de Oliveira Martins; Maria Elizabeth Pereira Passos; Cesar Miguel Momesso; Vinicius Coneglian Santos; Renata Gorjão; Tania Cristina Pithon-Curi; Maria Fernanda Cury-Boaventura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Association of moderate aerobic exercise and rho-associated kinase 2 concentration in subjects with dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Huadong Bai; Jingchun Sun; Guiying Du; Fengjun Jiao
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 6.  Risk of bias and reporting practices in studies comparing VO2max responses to sprint interval vs. continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacob T Bonafiglia; Hashim Islam; Nicholas Preobrazenski; Brendon J Gurd
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 13.077

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.