| Literature DB >> 25528748 |
D Manimanjari1, M Srinivasa Rao2, P Swathi1, C A Rama Rao3, M Vanaja1, M Maheswari1.
Abstract
Predicted increase in temperature and atmospheric CO2Entities:
Keywords: PRECIS; climate change; developmental time; insect pest; phytophagous insect
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25528748 PMCID: PMC5657882 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Change in bio chemical constituents of sunflower foliage grown under e CO 2 and a CO 2
| Biochemical |
CO
2
Concentrations
| LSD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| constituents |
|
| F(P) | |
|
| ||||
| Nitrogen % | 2.67 ± 0.10 | 2.81 ± 0.12 | 16.19 | 0.091 |
|
(
| ||||
| Carbon % | 41.63 ± 0.95 | 38.63 ± 0.83 | 46.71 | 1.129 |
|
(
| ||||
| C:N ratio | 15.60 ± 0.42 | 13.76 ± 0.59 | 61.17 | 0.606 |
|
(
| ||||
Mean values ± SD.
Developmental time (days) of different stages of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at six constant temperatures and two CO 2 conditions
| Temperature °C |
Developmental time at
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg | Larva | Pupa | Adult | Fecundity | Total life span | |
| 20 | 7.61 ± 0.51a | 29.80 ± 2.21a | 16.47 ± 1.73a | 5.34 ± 1.00a | 1,769 ± 549b | 59.20 ± 2.69a |
| 25 | 6.19 ± 0.68b | 15.07 ± 2.12b | 10 ± 0.88b | 3.70 ± 5.3b | 2,880.8 ± 569a | 35.13 ± 2.91b |
| 27 | 4.15 ± 4.00c | 14.07 ± 0.78c | 9.92 ± 1.14b | 5.36 ± 1.72a | 2,172.37 ± 1,039b | 33.27 ± 6.51bc |
| 30 | 3.48 ± 0.60d | 12.27 ± 0.59d | 6.71 ± 1.07c | 5.00 ± 2.64a | 2,092.7 ± 324b | 28.00 ± 6.96d |
| 33 | 4.21 ± 0.56c | 12.87 ± 1.19d | 10.43 ± 2.22b | 2.94 ± 0.97b | 585.8 ± 97c | 30.33 ± 3.28cd |
| 35 | 3.32 ± 0.49d | 12.87 ± 1.3d | 7.96 ± 0.98c | 3.56 ± 1.57b | 518 ± 48c | 27.80 ± 2.90d |
Means in the same column followed by different letter (a,b,c and d) are significantly different at P < 0.05 (ANOVA) by Tukey’s test.
Variation of table parameters of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at six constant temperatures and two CO 2 conditions
| Temperature °C |
|
Net reproductive rate (
|
|
Finite rate of increase (λ)
|
DT
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 20 | 0.1179 | 0.125 | 933 | 625.33 | 58 | 52.65 | 1.125 | 1.133 | 5.88 | 5.55 |
| 25 | 0.189 | 0.1721 | 933.73 | 601.4 | 36.19 | 37.18 | 1.208 | 1.187 | 3.67 | 4.03 |
| 27 | 0.207 | 0.202 | 1,056.1 | 612.75 | 33.63 | 31.73 | 1.23 | 1.224 | 3.35 | 3.43 |
| 30 | 0.227 | 0.22 | 539.55 | 275.55 | 27.64 | 29.92 | 1.255 | 1.206 | 3.05 | 3.15 |
| 33 | 0.1868 | 0.193 | 188.73 | 181.13 | 28.06 | 26.89 | 1.205 | 1.213 | 3.71 | 3.59 |
| 35 | 0.205 | 0.194 | 165.86 | 123.2 | 24.9 | 24.77 | 1.227 | 1.214 | 3.38 | 3.57 |
Fig. 1.(a) Relationship between temperature and life-table parameters (‘ rm ’ and ‘ Ro ’) of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at e CO 2 and a CO 2 . (b) Relationship between temperature and life-table parameters (‘ T ’ and ‘λ’) of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at e CO 2 and a CO 2 .
Prediction of pest scenarios using life table parameters during NF and DF CCS at four sunflower growing locations
| Locations | Present | NF | DF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Akola | 0.02 ± 0.02 |
0.15 ± 0.00
|
0.15 ± 0.00
| |
| Bangalore | (−0.05) ± 0.01 |
0.14 ± 0.00
|
0.15 ± 0.00
| |
| Hayathnagar | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
0.15 ± 0.00
|
0.14 ± 0.00
| |
| Raichur | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
0.15 ± 0.00
|
0.14 ± 0.01
| |
|
| ||||
| Akola | 525.44 ± 13.73 |
871.41 ± 31.14
|
704.51 ± 89.01
| |
| Bangalore | 571.71 ± 8.25 |
911.38 ± 36.95
|
775.44 ± 56.68
| |
| Hayathnagar | 486.11 ± 11.56 |
849.25 ± 47.15
|
653.78 ± 88.48
| |
| Raichur | 519.63 ± 10.45 |
799.01 ± 58.39
|
602.20 ± 105.78
| |
|
| ||||
| Akola | 33.29 ± 0.79 |
32.82 ± 1.28
|
28.57 ± 1.46
| |
| Bangalore | 36.46 ± 0.69 |
35.01 ± 2.31
|
29.86 ± 1.24
| |
| Hayathnagar | 31.34 ± 0.49 |
32.06 ± 1.61
|
27.75 ± 1.11
| |
| Raichur | 32.95 ± 0.56 |
30.53 ± 1.66
|
27.18 ± 0.98
| |
| λ | ||||
| Akola | 0.97 ± 0.00 |
2.76 ± 0.07
|
3.05 ± 0.13
| |
| Bangalore | 0.99 ± 0.00 |
2.66 ± 0.10
|
2.94 ± 0.09
| |
| Hayathnagar | 0.96 ± 0.00 |
2.81 ± 0.09
|
3.13 ± 0.12
| |
| Raichur | 0.97 ± 0.00 |
2.90 ± 0.11
|
3.20 ± 0.14
| |
**The difference relative to the present period is significant at P < 0.01.
Fig. 2.Per cent change in pest scenarios during NF and DF Climate change over persent period.