| Literature DB >> 25528748 |
D Manimanjari1, M Srinivasa Rao2, P Swathi1, C A Rama Rao3, M Vanaja1, M Maheswari1.
Abstract
Predicted increase in temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration will influence the growth of crop plants and phytophagous insects. The present study, conducted at the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India, aimed at (1) construction of life tables at six constant temperatures viz., 20, 25, 27, 30, 33, and 35 ± 0.5 °C for Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) reared on sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) grown under ambient and elevated CO2 (eCO2) (550 ppm) concentration in open top chambers and (2) prediction of the pest status in near future (NF) and distant future (DF) climate change scenarios at major sunflower growing locations of India. Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon and higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C:N) were observed in sunflower foliage grown under eCO2 over ambient. Feeding trials conducted on sunflower foliage obtained from two CO2 conditions showed that the developmental time of S. litura (Egg to adult) declined with increase in temperature and was more evident at eCO2. Finite (λ) and intrinsic rates of increase (r(m)), net reproductive rate (Ro), mean generation time, (T) and doubling time (DT) of S. litura increased significantly with temperature up to 27-30 °C and declined with further increase in temperature. Reduction of 'T' was observed from maximum value of 58 d at 20 °C to minimum of 24.9 d at 35 °C. The DT of population was higher (5.88 d) at 20 °C and lower (3.05 d) at 30 °C temperature of eCO2. The data on these life table parameters were plotted against temperature and two nonlinear models were developed separately for each of the CO2 conditions for predicting the pest scenarios. The NF and DF scenarios temperature data of four sunflower growing locations in India is based on PRECIS A1B emission scenario. It was predicted that increased 'rm', 'λ', and 'Ro' and reduced 'T' would occur during NF and DF scenario over present period at all locations. The present results indicate that temperature and CO2 are vital in influencing the population growth of S. litura and pest incidence may possibly be higher in the future.Entities:
Keywords: PRECIS; climate change; developmental time; insect pest; phytophagous insect
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25528748 PMCID: PMC5657882 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Change in bio chemical constituents of sunflower foliage grown under e CO 2 and a CO 2
| Biochemical |
CO
2
Concentrations
| LSD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| constituents |
|
| F(P) | |
|
| ||||
| Nitrogen % | 2.67 ± 0.10 | 2.81 ± 0.12 | 16.19 | 0.091 |
|
(
| ||||
| Carbon % | 41.63 ± 0.95 | 38.63 ± 0.83 | 46.71 | 1.129 |
|
(
| ||||
| C:N ratio | 15.60 ± 0.42 | 13.76 ± 0.59 | 61.17 | 0.606 |
|
(
| ||||
Mean values ± SD.
Developmental time (days) of different stages of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at six constant temperatures and two CO 2 conditions
| Temperature °C |
Developmental time at
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg | Larva | Pupa | Adult | Fecundity | Total life span | |
| 20 | 7.61 ± 0.51a | 29.80 ± 2.21a | 16.47 ± 1.73a | 5.34 ± 1.00a | 1,769 ± 549b | 59.20 ± 2.69a |
| 25 | 6.19 ± 0.68b | 15.07 ± 2.12b | 10 ± 0.88b | 3.70 ± 5.3b | 2,880.8 ± 569a | 35.13 ± 2.91b |
| 27 | 4.15 ± 4.00c | 14.07 ± 0.78c | 9.92 ± 1.14b | 5.36 ± 1.72a | 2,172.37 ± 1,039b | 33.27 ± 6.51bc |
| 30 | 3.48 ± 0.60d | 12.27 ± 0.59d | 6.71 ± 1.07c | 5.00 ± 2.64a | 2,092.7 ± 324b | 28.00 ± 6.96d |
| 33 | 4.21 ± 0.56c | 12.87 ± 1.19d | 10.43 ± 2.22b | 2.94 ± 0.97b | 585.8 ± 97c | 30.33 ± 3.28cd |
| 35 | 3.32 ± 0.49d | 12.87 ± 1.3d | 7.96 ± 0.98c | 3.56 ± 1.57b | 518 ± 48c | 27.80 ± 2.90d |
Means in the same column followed by different letter (a,b,c and d) are significantly different at P < 0.05 (ANOVA) by Tukey’s test.
Variation of table parameters of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at six constant temperatures and two CO 2 conditions
| Temperature °C |
|
Net reproductive rate (
|
|
Finite rate of increase (λ)
|
DT
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 20 | 0.1179 | 0.125 | 933 | 625.33 | 58 | 52.65 | 1.125 | 1.133 | 5.88 | 5.55 |
| 25 | 0.189 | 0.1721 | 933.73 | 601.4 | 36.19 | 37.18 | 1.208 | 1.187 | 3.67 | 4.03 |
| 27 | 0.207 | 0.202 | 1,056.1 | 612.75 | 33.63 | 31.73 | 1.23 | 1.224 | 3.35 | 3.43 |
| 30 | 0.227 | 0.22 | 539.55 | 275.55 | 27.64 | 29.92 | 1.255 | 1.206 | 3.05 | 3.15 |
| 33 | 0.1868 | 0.193 | 188.73 | 181.13 | 28.06 | 26.89 | 1.205 | 1.213 | 3.71 | 3.59 |
| 35 | 0.205 | 0.194 | 165.86 | 123.2 | 24.9 | 24.77 | 1.227 | 1.214 | 3.38 | 3.57 |
Fig. 1.(a) Relationship between temperature and life-table parameters (‘ rm ’ and ‘ Ro ’) of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at e CO 2 and a CO 2 . (b) Relationship between temperature and life-table parameters (‘ T ’ and ‘λ’) of Spodoptera litura on sunflower at e CO 2 and a CO 2 .
Prediction of pest scenarios using life table parameters during NF and DF CCS at four sunflower growing locations
| Locations | Present | NF | DF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Akola | 0.02 ± 0.02 |
0.15 ± 0.00
|
0.15 ± 0.00
| |
| Bangalore | (−0.05) ± 0.01 |
0.14 ± 0.00
|
0.15 ± 0.00
| |
| Hayathnagar | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
0.15 ± 0.00
|
0.14 ± 0.00
| |
| Raichur | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
0.15 ± 0.00
|
0.14 ± 0.01
| |
|
| ||||
| Akola | 525.44 ± 13.73 |
871.41 ± 31.14
|
704.51 ± 89.01
| |
| Bangalore | 571.71 ± 8.25 |
911.38 ± 36.95
|
775.44 ± 56.68
| |
| Hayathnagar | 486.11 ± 11.56 |
849.25 ± 47.15
|
653.78 ± 88.48
| |
| Raichur | 519.63 ± 10.45 |
799.01 ± 58.39
|
602.20 ± 105.78
| |
|
| ||||
| Akola | 33.29 ± 0.79 |
32.82 ± 1.28
|
28.57 ± 1.46
| |
| Bangalore | 36.46 ± 0.69 |
35.01 ± 2.31
|
29.86 ± 1.24
| |
| Hayathnagar | 31.34 ± 0.49 |
32.06 ± 1.61
|
27.75 ± 1.11
| |
| Raichur | 32.95 ± 0.56 |
30.53 ± 1.66
|
27.18 ± 0.98
| |
| λ | ||||
| Akola | 0.97 ± 0.00 |
2.76 ± 0.07
|
3.05 ± 0.13
| |
| Bangalore | 0.99 ± 0.00 |
2.66 ± 0.10
|
2.94 ± 0.09
| |
| Hayathnagar | 0.96 ± 0.00 |
2.81 ± 0.09
|
3.13 ± 0.12
| |
| Raichur | 0.97 ± 0.00 |
2.90 ± 0.11
|
3.20 ± 0.14
| |
**The difference relative to the present period is significant at P < 0.01.
Fig. 2.Per cent change in pest scenarios during NF and DF Climate change over persent period.