Literature DB >> 25528632

Recognizing upper limb movements with wrist worn inertial sensors using k-means clustering classification.

Dwaipayan Biswas1, Andy Cranny2, Nayaab Gupta3, Koushik Maharatna4, Josy Achner5, Jasmin Klemke6, Michael Jöbges7, Steffen Ortmann8.   

Abstract

In this paper we present a methodology for recognizing three fundamental movements of the human forearm (extension, flexion and rotation) using pattern recognition applied to the data from a single wrist-worn, inertial sensor. We propose that this technique could be used as a clinical tool to assess rehabilitation progress in neurodegenerative pathologies such as stroke or cerebral palsy by tracking the number of times a patient performs specific arm movements (e.g. prescribed exercises) with their paretic arm throughout the day. We demonstrate this with healthy subjects and stroke patients in a simple proof of concept study in which these arm movements are detected during an archetypal activity of daily-living (ADL) - 'making-a-cup-of-tea'. Data is collected from a tri-axial accelerometer and a tri-axial gyroscope located proximal to the wrist. In a training phase, movements are initially performed in a controlled environment which are represented by a ranked set of 30 time-domain features. Using a sequential forward selection technique, for each set of feature combinations three clusters are formed using k-means clustering followed by 10 runs of 10-fold cross validation on the training data to determine the best feature combinations. For the testing phase, movements performed during the ADL are associated with each cluster label using a minimum distance classifier in a multi-dimensional feature space, comprised of the best ranked features, using Euclidean or Mahalanobis distance as the metric. Experiments were performed with four healthy subjects and four stroke survivors and our results show that the proposed methodology can detect the three movements performed during the ADL with an overall average accuracy of 88% using the accelerometer data and 83% using the gyroscope data across all healthy subjects and arm movement types. The average accuracy across all stroke survivors was 70% using accelerometer data and 66% using gyroscope data. We also use a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifier and a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier in association with the same set of features to detect the three arm movements and compare the results to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed methodology.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2330; 3380; Activities of daily living; Activity recognition; Inertial sensors; Minimum distance classifier; Remote telehealth monitoring; k-Means clustering

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25528632     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  12 in total

1.  Measuring upper limb function in children with hemiparesis with 3D inertial sensors.

Authors:  Christopher J Newman; Roselyn Bruchez; Sylvie Roches; Marine Jequier Gygax; Cyntia Duc; Farzin Dadashi; Fabien Massé; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Machine learning in human movement biomechanics: Best practices, common pitfalls, and new opportunities.

Authors:  Eni Halilaj; Apoorva Rajagopal; Madalina Fiterau; Jennifer L Hicks; Trevor J Hastie; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A composite robotic-based measure of upper limb proprioception.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Kenzie; Jennifer A Semrau; Michael D Hill; Stephen H Scott; Sean P Dukelow
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Significant Change Spotting for Periodic Human Motion Segmentation of Cleaning Tasks Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Kai-Chun Liu; Chia-Tai Chan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Would a thermal sensor improve arm motion classification accuracy of a single wrist-mounted inertial device?

Authors:  Jordan Lui; Carlo Menon
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Automatic Classification of Squat Posture Using Inertial Sensors: Deep Learning Approach.

Authors:  Jaehyun Lee; Hyosung Joo; Junglyeon Lee; Youngjoon Chee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Improving Human Activity Recognition Performance by Data Fusion and Feature Engineering.

Authors:  Jingcheng Chen; Yining Sun; Shaoming Sun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Application of machine learning to the identification of joint degrees of freedom involved in abnormal movement during upper limb prosthesis use.

Authors:  Sophie L Wang; Conor Bloomer; Gene Civillico; Kimberly Kontson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automatic Functional Shoulder Task Identification and Sub-task Segmentation Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units for Frozen Shoulder Assessment.

Authors:  Chih-Ya Chang; Chia-Yeh Hsieh; Hsiang-Yun Huang; Yung-Tsan Wu; Liang-Cheng Chen; Chia-Tai Chan; Kai-Chun Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments.

Authors:  Fabian Marcel Rast; Rob Labruyère
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.