Literature DB >> 25528419

Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.

David M Haas1, Sarah Morgan, Karenrose Contreras.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (10 December 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies. MAIN
RESULTS: Seven trials randomizing 2816 women (2635 analyzed) evaluated the effects of vaginal cleansing (all with povidone-iodine) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. The risk of bias was generally low, with the quality of most of the studies being high. Vaginal preparation immediately before cesarean delivery significantly reduced the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 8.3% in control groups to 4.3% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.81, seven trials, 2635 women). The risk reduction was particularly strong for women who were already in labor at the time of the cesarean delivery (7.4% in the vaginal cleansing group versus 13.0% in the control group; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.95, three trials, 523 women) and for women with ruptured membranes (4.3% in the vaginal cleansing group versus 17.9% in the control group; RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.55, three trials, 272 women). No other outcomes realized statistically significant differences between the vaginal cleansing and control groups. No adverse effects were reported with the povidone-iodine vaginal cleansing.The quality of the evidence using GRADE was low for post-cesarean endometritis, moderate for postoperative fever, and low for wound infection. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of postoperative endometritis. This benefit is particularly realized for women undergoing cesarean delivery, who are already in labor or who have ruptured membranes. As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers should consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before performing cesarean deliveries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25528419     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.pub5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  10 in total

1.  Effect of intra-operative glove changing during cesarean section on post-operative complications: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jonathan D Scrafford; Buvana Reddy; Colleen Rivard; Rachel Isaksson Vogel
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Institutional Protocols for Vaginal Preparation With Antiseptic Solution and Surgical Site Infection Rate in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery During Labor.

Authors:  Mauricio La Rosa; Victoria Jauk; George Saade; Kim Boggess; Sherri Longo; Erin A S Clark; Sean Esplin; Kirsten Cleary; Ronald Wapner; Kellett Letson; Michelle Y Owens; Sean Blackwell; Jeff M Szychowski; William W Andrews; Alan T Tita
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Does uterine gauze packing increase the risk of puerperal morbidity in the management of postpartum hemorrhage during caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu-Na Guo; Jue Ma; Xiao-Jin Wang; Bing-Shun Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

Review 4.  Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.

Authors:  Zhenmi Liu; Jo C Dumville; Gill Norman; Maggie J Westby; Jane Blazeby; Emma McFarlane; Nicky J Welton; Louise O'Connor; Julie Cawthorne; Ryan P George; Emma J Crosbie; Amber D Rithalia; Hung-Yuan Cheng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-06

5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preoperative Antisepsis with Combination Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine.

Authors:  Benjamin M Davies; Hiren C Patel
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2016-08-10

6.  Chlorhexidine vaginal preparation versus standard treatment at caesarean section to reduce endometritis and prevent sepsis-a feasibility study protocol (the PREPS trial).

Authors:  V Hodgetts Morton; A Wilson; C Hewitt; A Weckesser; N Farmer; D Lissauer; P Hardy; R K Morris
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-06-04

Review 7.  Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.

Authors:  David M Haas; Sarah Morgan; Karenrose Contreras; Savannah Enders
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-17

8.  Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.

Authors:  David M Haas; Sarah Morgan; Karenrose Contreras; Savannah Kimball
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-26

9.  Productivity cost due to postpartum ill health: A cross-sectional study in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Nuwan Darshana Wickramasinghe; Jennifer Horton; Ishani Darshika; Kaushila Dinithi Galgamuwa; Wasantha Pradeep Ranasinghe; Thilini Chanchala Agampodi; Suneth Buddhika Agampodi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Improving surgical quality in low-income and middle-income countries: why do some health facilities perform better than others?

Authors:  Shehnaz Alidina; Pritha Chatterjee; Noor Zanial; Sakshie Sanjay Alreja; Rebecca Balira; David Barash; Edwin Ernest; Geofrey Charles Giiti; Erastus Maina; Adelina Mazhiqi; Rahma Mushi; Cheri Reynolds; Meaghan Sydlowski; Florian Tinuga; Sarah Maongezi; John G Meara; Ntuli A Kapologwe; Erin Barringer; Monica Cainer; Isabelle Citron; Amanda DiMeo; Laura Fitzgerald; Hiba Ghandour; Magdalena Gruendl; Augustino Hellar; Desmond T Jumbam; Adam Katoto; Lauren Kelly; Steve Kisakye; Salome Kuchukhidze; Tenzing N Lama; Gopal Menon; Stella Mshana; Chase Reynolds; Hannington Segirinya; Dorcas Simba; Victoria Smith; Steven J Staffa; Christopher Strader; Leopold Tibyehabwa; Alena Troxel; John Varallo; Taylor Wurdeman; David Zurakowski
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 7.035

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.