Literature DB >> 25528065

Age differences and longitudinal change in the effects of data collection mode on self-reports of psychosocial functioning.

Gloria Luong1, Susan T Charles2, Karen S Rook2, Chandra A Reynolds3, Margaret Gatz4.   

Abstract

The current study investigated age differences and longitudinal change in mode effects, wherein individuals report less negative and more positive psychosocial functioning with data collection modes that have greater (vs. less) direct contact with interviewers (e.g., in-person interviews vs. telephone interviews). Using 2 longitudinal datasets, the Later Life Study of Social Exchanges (LLSSE) and Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging (SATSA), we tested how mode effects may vary with cohort (baseline age differences) and maturational development (longitudinal change). In Study 1, LLSSE participants (65-90 years old) completed in-person and telephone interviews assessing negative and positive aspects of psychosocial functioning across 2 years. The data collection mode with greater direct contact with interviewers (in-person interviews) was associated with reporting less negative and more positive psychosocial functioning compared to the mode with less direct contact (telephone interviews). These mode effects were more pronounced with older baseline age, but only for the negative psychosocial measures. Mode effects also became stronger over time for reports of negative affect. In Study 2, SATSA participants (38-86 years old) completed mailed questionnaires and questionnaires collected in-person that assessed depressive symptoms and positive affect across 18 years. Consistent with Study 1, participants reported fewer depressive symptoms and more positive affect with greater (vs. less) direct contact with interviewers (questionnaires collected in-person vs. mailed questionnaires). For reports of depressive symptoms, but not positive affect, mode effects were more pronounced with age and time. Together, the results underscore how mode effects may contribute to inconsistent findings in the socioemotional aging literature. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25528065      PMCID: PMC4362730          DOI: 10.1037/a0038502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  39 in total

Review 1.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.

Authors:  Ann Bowling
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Stability and change in affective experience across the adult life span: analyses with a national sample from Germany.

Authors:  Ute Kunzmann; David Richter; Stefan C Schmukle
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-08-05

3.  The Swedish Adoption Twin Study of Aging: an update.

Authors:  N L Pedersen; G E McClearn; R Plomin; J R Nesselroade; S Berg; U DeFaire
Journal:  Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)       Date:  1991

4.  Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults.

Authors:  P M Lewinsohn; J R Seeley; R E Roberts; N B Allen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-06

5.  A revised CES-D measure of depressive symptoms and a DSM-based measure of major depressive episodes in the elderly.

Authors:  C L Turvey; R B Wallace; R Herzog
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.878

6.  Influence of social desirability on age differences in self-reports of mood and personality.

Authors:  Andrea Soubelet; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2011-06-20

7.  Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing.

Authors:  Frieder R Lang; Dennis John; Oliver Lüdtke; Jürgen Schupp; Gert G Wagner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-06

8.  Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: a daily diary study.

Authors:  Kira S Birditt; Karen L Fingerman; David M Almeida
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-06

9.  Rates of symptoms of depression in a national sample.

Authors:  W W Eaton; L G Kessler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Are old people more depressed? Cross-sectional data on Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale factors.

Authors:  M Gatz; M L Hurwicz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1990-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  Anxiety trajectories in the second half of life: Genetic and environmental contributions over age.

Authors:  Lewina O Lee; Margaret Gatz; Nancy L Pedersen; Carol A Prescott
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-01-11

2.  Extracting Response Style Bias From Measures of Positive and Negative Affect in Aging Research.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Psychological stress declines rapidly from age 50 in the United States: Yet another well-being paradox.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Stefan Schneider; Joan E Broderick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Explaining age differences in the memory-experience gap.

Authors:  Doerte U Junghaenel; Joan E Broderick; Stefan Schneider; Cheng K F Wen; Hio Wa Mak; Sarah Goldstein; Marilyn Mendez; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.