OBJECTIVE: Quality of care monitoring is a key strategy for health policy. In Italy, the AMD Annals continuous monitoring and quality improvement initiative has been in place since 2006. Results after 8 years are now available. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Quality of diabetes care indicators during the years 2004-2011 were extracted from electronic medical records of 300 diabetes clinics. From 200,000 to 500,000 patients with type 2 diabetes were analyzed per year. Six process indicators, eight intermediate outcome indicators, seven indicators of treatment intensity/appropriateness, and a quality of care summary score (Q score) were evaluated. Previous studies documented that the risk of developing a new cardiovascular event was 80 % higher in patients with a Q score <15 and 20 % higher in those with a score between 15 and 25, as compared to those with a score >25. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with HbA1c ≤7 %, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl, and blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg increased by 4.8, 21.9, and 10.0 %, respectively. Process and treatment intensity/appropriateness indicators consistently improved. The proportion of patients with a Q score <15 decreased from 13.5 to 6.5 %, while those with a Q score >25 increased from 22.9 to 38.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: AMD Annals document the progress in quality of diabetes care. Longitudinal improvements in Q score can translate into less cardiovascular events, with evident clinical and economic implications. AMD Annals represent a physician-led effort not requiring allocation of extra-economic resources, which is easy to implement and deeply rooted in routine clinical practice. They are a potential case model for other healthcare systems.
OBJECTIVE: Quality of care monitoring is a key strategy for health policy. In Italy, the AMD Annals continuous monitoring and quality improvement initiative has been in place since 2006. Results after 8 years are now available. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Quality of diabetes care indicators during the years 2004-2011 were extracted from electronic medical records of 300 diabetes clinics. From 200,000 to 500,000 patients with type 2 diabetes were analyzed per year. Six process indicators, eight intermediate outcome indicators, seven indicators of treatment intensity/appropriateness, and a quality of care summary score (Q score) were evaluated. Previous studies documented that the risk of developing a new cardiovascular event was 80 % higher in patients with a Q score <15 and 20 % higher in those with a score between 15 and 25, as compared to those with a score >25. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with HbA1c ≤7 %, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl, and blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg increased by 4.8, 21.9, and 10.0 %, respectively. Process and treatment intensity/appropriateness indicators consistently improved. The proportion of patients with a Q score <15 decreased from 13.5 to 6.5 %, while those with a Q score >25 increased from 22.9 to 38.5 %. CONCLUSIONS:AMD Annals document the progress in quality of diabetes care. Longitudinal improvements in Q score can translate into less cardiovascular events, with evident clinical and economic implications. AMD Annals represent a physician-led effort not requiring allocation of extra-economic resources, which is easy to implement and deeply rooted in routine clinical practice. They are a potential case model for other healthcare systems.
Authors: Maria Chiara Rossi; Giuseppe Lucisano; Basilio Pintaudi; Angela Bulotta; Sandro Gentile; Marco Scardapane; Soren Eik Skovlund; Giacomo Vespasiani; Antonio Nicolucci Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Nicoletta Musacchio; Annalisa Giancaterini; Giacomo Guaita; Alessandro Ozzello; Maria A Pellegrini; Paola Ponzani; Giuseppina T Russo; Rita Zilich; Alberto de Micheli Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Valeria Manicardi; Giuseppina Russo; Angela Napoli; Elisabetta Torlone; Patrizia Li Volsi; Carlo Bruno Giorda; Nicoletta Musacchio; Antonio Nicolucci; Concetta Suraci; Giuseppe Lucisano; Maria Chiara Rossi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carlo Bruno Giorda; Federico Pisani; Alberto De Micheli; Paola Ponzani; Giuseppina Russo; Giacomo Guaita; Rita Zilich; Nicoletta Musacchio Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-09