Literature DB >> 25527732

The comet assay in Environmental Risk Assessment of marine pollutants: applications, assets and handicaps of surveying genotoxicity in non-model organisms.

Marta Martins1, Pedro M Costa2.   

Abstract

Determining the genotoxic effects of pollutants has long been a priority in Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) for coastal ecosystems, especially of complex areas such as estuaries and other confined waterbodies. The acknowledged link between DNA damage, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity to the exposure to certain toxicants has been responsible to the growing interest in determining the genotoxic effects of xenobiotics to wildlife as a measure of environmental risk. The comet assay, although widely employed in in vivo and in vitro toxicology, still holds many constraints in ERA, in large part owing to difficulties in obtaining conclusive cause-effect relationships from complex environments. Nevertheless, these challenges do not hinder the attempts to apply the alkaline comet assay on sentinel organisms, wild or subjected to bioassays in or ex situ (from fish to molluscs) as well to standardise protocols and establish general guidelines to the interpretation of findings. Fish have been regarded as an appealing subject due to the ease of performing the comet assay in whole blood. However, the application of the comet assay is becoming increasingly common in invertebrates (e.g. in molluscan haemocytes and solid tissues such as gills). Virtually all sorts of results have been obtained from the application of the comet assay in ERA (null, positive and inconclusive). However, it has become clear that interpreting DNA damage data from wild organisms is particularly challenging due to their ability to adapt to continuous environmental stressors, including toxicants. Also, the comet assay in non-model organisms for the purpose of ERA implies different constraints, assumptions and interpretation of findings, compared with the in vitro procedures from which most guidelines have been derived. This paper critically reviews the application of the comet assay in ERA, focusing on target organisms and tissues; protocol developments, case studies plus data handling and interpretation.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25527732     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geu037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) induction in sediment extracts from New Zealand urban estuaries.

Authors:  Patrick Heinrich; Lara L Petschick; Grant L Northcott; Louis A Tremblay; James M Ataria; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Ecotoxicological and biochemical mixture effects of an herbicide and a metal at the marine primary producer diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the primary consumer copepod Acartia tonsa.

Authors:  Valentina Filimonova; Charlotte Nys; Karel A C De Schamphelaere; Fernando Gonçalves; João C Marques; Ana M M Gonçalves; Marleen De Troch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Risk assessment of pesticides in estuaries: a review addressing the persistence of an old problem in complex environments.

Authors:  Nagore Cuevas; Marta Martins; Pedro M Costa
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Co-exposure to environmental carcinogens in vivo induces neoplasia-related hallmarks in low-genotoxicity events, even after removal of insult.

Authors:  Marta Martins; Ana Silva; Maria H Costa; Célia Miguel; Pedro M Costa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessment of the ecotoxicity of urban estuarine sediment using benthic and pelagic copepod bioassays.

Authors:  Maria P Charry; Vaughan Keesing; Mark Costello; Louis A Tremblay
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.