Literature DB >> 25527724

Does the duration of lysis affect the sensitivity of the in vitro alkaline comet assay?

José Manuel Enciso1, Oscar Sánchez1, Adela López de Cerain1, Amaya Azqueta2.   

Abstract

The alkaline comet assay is now the method of choice for measuring different kinds of DNA damage in cells. Several attempts have been made to identify and evaluate the critical points affecting the comet assay outcome, highlighting the requirement of arriving at a standardised protocol in order to be able to compare the results obtained in different laboratories. However, reports on the effect of modifying the time of lysis are lacking. Here we tested different times of lysis (from no lysis to 1 week) in control HeLa cells and HeLa cells treated with different concentrations of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or H2O2. We also tested different times of lysis in the comet assay combined with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) in untreated and Ro 19-8022 plus light-treated HeLa cells. The same DNA damage levels were detected in the absence of lysis or after 1h of lysis when the standard comet assay was used to detect the MMS- and H2O2-induced lesions; the response increased when longer lysis was used, up to at least 1 week. When FPG was used, a minimum lysis period of 5 min was necessary to allow the enzyme to reach the DNA; the same DNA damage levels were detected after 5 min or 1h of lysis and the response increased up to 24h. In conclusion, the time of lysis can be varied depending on the sensitivity needed in both versions of the assay, and a constant time of lysis should be used if results from different experiments or laboratories are to be compared.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25527724     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geu047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  7 in total

1.  Controlling variation in the comet assay.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins; Naouale El Yamani; Yolanda Lorenzo; Sergey Shaposhnikov; Gunnar Brunborg; Amaya Azqueta
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Correlations between Risk Factors for Breast Cancer and Genetic Instability in Cancer Patients-A Clinical Perspective Study.

Authors:  Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz; Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar; Antonio Luiz Gomes Junior; Keylla da Conceição Machado; Muhammad Torequl Islam; Eunus S Ali; Manik Chandra Shill; Md Iqbal Ahmed; Shaikh Jamal Uddin; Ana Maria Oliveira Ferreira da Mata; Ricardo Melo de Carvalho; Kátia da Conceição Machado; André Luiz Pinho Sobral; Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva; João Marcelo de Castro E Souza; Daniel Dias Rufino Arcanjo; Paulo Michel Pinheiro Ferreira; Siddhartha Kumar Mishra; Juliana da Silva; Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo-Cavalcante
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Closed-type pre-treatment device for point-of-care testing of sputum.

Authors:  Hyun-Ju Park; Ayoung Woo; Jae Min Cha; Kyu-Sung Lee; Min-Young Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay.

Authors:  Mahsa Karbaschi; Yunhee Ji; Abdulhadi Mohammed S Abdulwahed; Alhanoof Alohaly; Juan F Bedoya; Shanna L Burke; Thomas M Boulos; Helen G Tempest; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Evaluation of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation from myocardial perfusion imaging: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anna Paula Arpini; Andrea De Lorenzo; Aniele Moritz; Julia Passarelli Pereira; Glauber Monteiro Dias
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.174

6.  Persistent Increased Frequency of Genomic Instability in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer: Before, during, and after Treatments.

Authors:  Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz; André Luiz Pinho Sobral; Jaqueline Nascimento Picada; Ivana Grivicich; Antonio Luiz Gomes Júnior; Ana Maria Oliveira Ferreira da Mata; Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar; Rodrigo Mendes de Carvalho; Kátia da Conceição Machado; Muhammad Torequl Islam; Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo Cavalcante; Juliana da Silva
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Oxidative damage and DNA repair in desiccated recalcitrant embryonic axes of Acer pseudoplatanus L.

Authors:  Beata P Plitta-Michalak; Alice A Ramos; Piotr Pupel; Marcin Michalak
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.215

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.