Literature DB >> 25527691

Demand management: an audit of chemical pathology test rejections by an electronic gate-keeping system at an academic hospital in Cape Town.

Ida Smit1, Annalise E Zemlin2, Rajiv T Erasmus1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Demand management is an area of laboratory activity, which is becoming increasingly important. Within the health-care system, demand management can be defined as the use of health resources to maximise its utility. Tygerberg Hospital has introduced an electronic gate-keeping system. Chemistry tests which generate the highest cost are subjected to this system and may be automatically rejected according to a set of rules. This study aimed: (1) to identify the number of chemistry tests rejected by the eGK; (2) to identify which of these rejected tests were subsequently restored and (3) to assess the impact of rejections on clinical outcome and cost-saving.
METHODS: A retrospective audit was conducted to determine the number of chemistry tests rejected and subsequently restored over a 6-month period. The case-notes of patients for whom requested tests previously rejected had been restored were randomly selected and investigated to assess clinical impact. Any cost-saving was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 68,480 tests were subjected to gate-keeping, and 4605 tests (6.7%) were rejected while 679 (14.7%) of these were restored by the requestor phoning the laboratory after obtaining authorisation. After examining a subset of clinical notes it was found that in most cases (80%), patient care was unaffected. The total cost saved was £ 25,387.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the rejected tests were unnecessary and following rejection, real savings were made. Electronic gate-keeping is a simple, effective and sustainable method of demand management.
© The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Demand management; audit; cost-saving; electronic gate-keeping

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527691     DOI: 10.1177/0004563214567688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  2 in total

1.  Errors in the Extra-Analytical Phases of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Annalise E Zemlin
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-05-05

Review 2.  Reducing Test Utilization in Hospital Settings: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Renuka S Bindraban; Maarten J Ten Berg; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Mark H H Kramer; Wouter W Van Solinge; Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.464

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.