Literature DB >> 25527614

Surrogate mothers 10 years on: a longitudinal study of psychological well-being and relationships with the parents and child.

V Jadva1, S Imrie2, S Golombok2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How do the psychological health and experiences of surrogate mothers change from 1 year to 10 years following the birth of the surrogacy child? SUMMARY ANSWER: The psychological well-being of surrogate mothers did not change 10 years following the birth, with all remaining positive about the surrogacy arrangement and the majority continuing to report good mental health. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Studies have found that surrogates may find the weeks following the birth difficult, but do not experience psychological problems 6 months or 1 year later. Research has also shown that surrogates can form close relationships with the intended parents during the pregnancy which may continue after the birth. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study used a prospective longitudinal design, in which 20 surrogates were seen at two time points: 1 year following the birth of the surrogacy child and 10 years later. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: The 20 surrogates (representing 59% of the original sample) participated in a semi-structured interview and completed self-report questionnaires. Eleven surrogates were gestational carriers and nine surrogates had used their own oocyte (genetic surrogacy). Four were previously known to the intended parents and 16 were previously not known. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Ten years following the birth of the surrogacy child, surrogate mothers scored within the normal range for self-esteem and did not show signs of depression as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory. Marital quality remained positive over time. All surrogates reported that their expectations of their relationship with the intended parents had been either met or exceeded and most reported positive feelings towards the child. In terms of expectations for the future, most surrogates reported that they would like to maintain contact or would be available to the child if the child wished to contact them. None expressed regrets about their involvement in surrogacy. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size of this study was small and the women may not be representative of all surrogates. Therefore the extent to which these findings can be generalized is not known. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Contrary to concerns about the potentially negative long-term effect of surrogacy, the findings suggest that surrogacy can be a positive experience for some women at least. These findings are important for policy and practice of surrogacy around the world.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  psychological well-being; surrogacy; surrogate mother

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527614     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Surrogacy, Compensation, and Legal Parentage: Against the Adoption Model.

Authors:  Liezl van Zyl; Ruth Walker
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Donor egg is the best second choice for many infertile couples: real progress in overcoming age-related fertility is not here yet.

Authors:  Reeva Makhijani; Daniel R Grow
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello
Journal:  Laws       Date:  2015-09

4.  The psychological well-being and prenatal bonding of gestational surrogates.

Authors:  N Lamba; V Jadva; K Kadam; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Parents' relationship with their surrogate in cross-border and domestic surrogacy arrangements: comparisons by sexual orientation and location.

Authors:  Vasanti Jadva; Natalie Gamble; Helen Prosser; Susan Imrie
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Mothers for Others: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Gestational Surrogates' Child Relinquishment Experiences.

Authors:  Austin P Ferolino; Mia Angelica D Camposo; Karla Christianne L Estaño; Jessa Marie R Tacbobo
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 7.  Surrogacy and "Procreative Tourism". What Does the Future Hold from the Ethical and Legal Perspectives?

Authors:  Valeria Piersanti; Francesca Consalvo; Fabrizio Signore; Alessandro Del Rio; Simona Zaami
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Reprowebs: a conceptual approach to elasticity and change in the global assisted reproduction industry.

Authors:  Anika König; Heather Jacobson
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2021-10-09

9.  Gay father surrogacy families: relationships with surrogates and egg donors and parental disclosure of children's origins.

Authors:  Lucy Blake; Nicola Carone; Jenna Slutsky; Elizabeth Raffanello; Anke A Ehrhardt; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  The social paradoxes of commercial surrogacy in developing countries: India before the new law of 2018.

Authors:  Virginie Rozée; Sayeed Unisa; Elise de La Rochebrochard
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.809

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.