| Literature DB >> 25527575 |
Kui Liu1, Buli Fu2, Jiangrong Lin3, Yueguan Fu2, Zhengqiang Peng2, Qi'an Jin2.
Abstract
Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the effect of temperature and cold storage on the performance of Tetrastichus brontispae (Ferriere) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), one of the major endoparasitoids against coconut hispine beetle, Brontispa longissima (Gestro) (Coleptera: Chrysomelidae). The results revealed that T. brontispae could successfully parasitize host pupae under all seven tested temperatures, but no adult emergence was observed at 32°C. It was also revealed that temperatures between 24 and 26°C appeared to be the optimum temperatures for parasitism, as these temperatures resulted in the most parasitized pupae and a significantly higher emergence rate and progeny production. These measurements significantly declined at 20, 30, and 32°C. This study confirmed developmental periods of parasitoid progeny decreased as the temperature increased, and sex ratio of this female-biased parasitoid was not affected by rearing temperatures. More importantly, this study indicated that cold storage of parasitized pupae could extend up to 30 d at 10°C, and a longer storage period had a significant adverse effect on mean adult emergence and parasitism performance. Ten days might be the optimum cold-storage period at 10°C, as parasitism performance, emergence rate, and progeny production at this storage period were similar to the control of 26°C. Furthermore, the developmental period, emergence rate, and sex ratio of progeny that emerged from cold-stored parasitized pupae were not influenced by storage periods, whereas parasitism performance of progeny decreased as storage period increased. This study suggests that about 24-26°C would be the optimal temperature for mass production and release of T. brontispae for biological control of B. longissima. These results also provide novel findings that a period of 10 d at 10°C may be more suitable and acceptable for ideal cold storage of parasitized pupae of T. brontispae.Entities:
Keywords: biological control; development; parasitism; parasitoid; progeny
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25527575 PMCID: PMC5634123 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Longevity and number of host parasitized of T. brontispae under different constant temperatures
| Temperature (°C) | Longevity (d) | No. of host parasitized |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 10.54 ± 0.38 a | 3.03 ± 0.32 ab |
| 22 | 10.07 ± 0.53 a | 3.10 ± 0.18 ab |
| 24 | 6.26 ± 0.28 b | 3.67 ± 0.24 ab |
| 26 | 4.38 ± 0.31 bc | 3.93 ± 0.48 a |
| 28 | 4.47 ± 0.18 bc | 2.30 ± 0.17 ab |
| 30 | 4.32 ± 0.23 c | 1.73 ± 0.12 bc |
| 32 | 3.86 ± 0.21 c | 1.10 ± 0.17 c |
Data are presented as means ± SE. Means in the same column followed by different small letters are significantly different at P = 0.05 level by Tukey’s test.
Developmental time and reproduction of T. brontispae under different constant temperatures
| Temperature (°C) | Developmental times (d) | % Adult emergence rate | No. of emerged females | Sex ratio (% female) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 29.32 ± 0.20 a | 67.90 ± 7.75 c | 20.06 ± 0.62 c | 89.71 ± 3.35 a |
| 22 | 28.56 ± 0.13 a | 90.89 ± 5.51 a | 26.23 ± 1.34 b | 90.35 ± 3.46 a |
| 24 | 21.30 ± 0.16 b | 91.67 ± 4.16 a | 32.77 ± 2.30 a | 88.29 ± 4.07 a |
| 26 | 18.61 ± 0.11 c | 91.67 ± 6.75 a | 33.93 ± 1.68 a | 88.60 ± 4.24 a |
| 28 | 17.23 ± 0.08 c | 85.06 ± 5.25 b | 18.50 ± 3.37 c | 90.55 ± 4.89 a |
| 30 | 17.18 ± 0.23 c | 46.43 ± 6.82 d | 9.70 ± 0.61 d | 89.81 ± 3.38 a |
| 32 | – | – | – | – |
Data are presented as means ± SE. Means in the same column followed by different small letters are significantly different at P = 0.05 level by Tukey’s test.
Fig. 1.Regression analysis of progeny of T. brontispae development rate at five constant temperatures.
Emergence rate, developmental time, and number of females per parasitized pupae and sex ratio of T. brontispae under different cold-storage periods of pupae at 10°C
| Days in cold storage | % Adult emergence rate | Developmental time (d) | No. of females per parasitized pupae | Sex ratio (% female) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 90.00 ± 5.77 a | 18.17 ± 0.03 d | 9.77 ± 0.78 a | 83.93 ± 4.09 a |
| 10 | 80.00 ± 5.75 ab | 27.88 ± 0.12 c | 8.90 ± 0.73 ab | 85.52 ± 5.22 a |
| 20 | 70.00 ± 5.77 b | 38.59 ± 0.16 b | 6.60 ± 0.90 bc | 86.05 ± 5.47 a |
| 30 | 66.67 ± 6.66 c | 48.75 ± 0.18 a | 4.40 ± 0.23 c | 84.61 ± 4.65 a |
Data are presented as means ± SE. Means in the same column followed by different small letters are significantly different at P = 0.05 level by Dunnett’s test.
Longevity and number of host parasitized of T. brontispae under different cold-storage periods of pupae at 10°C
| Days in cold storage | Longevity (d) | No. of host parasitized |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.39 ± 0.32 a | 3.93 ± 0.48 a |
| 10 | 4.24 ± 0.38 a | 3.93 ± 0.20 a |
| 20 | 3.42 ± 0.53 b | 2.13 ± 0.20 b |
| 30 | 3.16 ± 0.28 b | 1.97 ± 0.19 b |
Data are presented as means ± SE. Means in the same column followed by different small letters are significantly different at P = 0.05 level by Dunnett’s test.
Developmental time and reproduction of T. brontispae under different cold-storage periods of pupae at 10°C
| Days in cold storage | Developmental times (d) | % Adult emergence rate | No. of emerged females | Sex ratio (% female) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 18.72 ± 0.15 ab | 90.69 ± 6.24 a | 33.93 ± 1.68 a | 88.60 ± 3.57 a |
| 10 | 18.86 ± 0.12 ab | 91.90 ± 6.78 a | 33.97 ± 0.23 a | 88.30 ± 3.22 a |
| 20 | 21.24 ± 0.21 a | 88.26 ± 5.57 a | 19.20 ± 1.14 b | 90.14 ± 3.85 a |
| 30 | 21.56 ± 0.24 a | 89.64 ± 5.45 a | 18.37 ± 2.04 b | 90.76 ± 4.06 a |
Data are presented as means ± SE. Means in the same column followed by different small letters are significantly different at P = 0.05 level by Dunnett’s test.