Harvey Max Chochinov1, Susan McClement2, Thomas Hack2, Genevieve Thompson2, Brenden Dufault3, Mike Harlos4. 1. Manitoba Palliative Care Research Unit, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Electronic address: harvey.chochinov@cancercare.mb.ca. 2. Manitoba Palliative Care Research Unit, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; College of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 3. George & Fay Yee Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 4. Palliative Medicine Section, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Failure to acknowledge personhood is often the cause of patient and family dissatisfaction. We developed the Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) as a simple means of inquiring about personhood: "What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?" OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the PDQ on patients and families, evaluate its influence on health care providers (HCPs), and determine if HCP characteristics mediate receptivity to PDQ-elicited information. METHODS: Palliative care patients or their family members were asked to respond to the PDQ. Responses were summarized, read to participants to ensure accuracy, and with permission, placed in their charts. Patient, family, and HCP responses to the PDQ were then elicited. RESULTS: A total of 126 participants (66 patients and 60 family members) responded to the PDQ; 99% indicated that the summaries were accurate, 97% permitted the summary to be placed in the chart, 93% felt that the information was important for HCPs to know, and 99% would recommend the PDQ for others. A total of 137 HCPs completed 293 evaluations of individual PDQs; 90% indicated that they learned something new from it, 64% that they were emotionally affected by it, 59% that it influenced their sense of empathy, and 44% that it influenced their care. HCP empathy, job satisfaction, having a meaningful life, and social support mediated responsiveness to PDQ-elicited information. CONCLUSION: The PDQ offers an effective way of eliciting personhood, enhancing patient, family, and HCP experience alike.
CONTEXT: Failure to acknowledge personhood is often the cause of patient and family dissatisfaction. We developed the Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) as a simple means of inquiring about personhood: "What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?" OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the PDQ on patients and families, evaluate its influence on health care providers (HCPs), and determine if HCP characteristics mediate receptivity to PDQ-elicited information. METHODS: Palliative care patients or their family members were asked to respond to the PDQ. Responses were summarized, read to participants to ensure accuracy, and with permission, placed in their charts. Patient, family, and HCP responses to the PDQ were then elicited. RESULTS: A total of 126 participants (66 patients and 60 family members) responded to the PDQ; 99% indicated that the summaries were accurate, 97% permitted the summary to be placed in the chart, 93% felt that the information was important for HCPs to know, and 99% would recommend the PDQ for others. A total of 137 HCPs completed 293 evaluations of individual PDQs; 90% indicated that they learned something new from it, 64% that they were emotionally affected by it, 59% that it influenced their sense of empathy, and 44% that it influenced their care. HCP empathy, job satisfaction, having a meaningful life, and social support mediated responsiveness to PDQ-elicited information. CONCLUSION: The PDQ offers an effective way of eliciting personhood, enhancing patient, family, and HCP experience alike.
Authors: Anjali V Desai; Virginia M Klimek; Kimberly Chow; Andrew S Epstein; Camila Bernal; Kelly Anderson; Molly Okpako; Robin Rawlins-Duell; Dana Kramer; Danielle Romano; Jessica I Goldberg; Judith E Nelson Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Andrew S Epstein; Eileen M O'Reilly; Elyse Shuk; William Breitbart; Maheen A Shah; Michele Ly; Rachel Tayler; Angelo E Volandes Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Andrew S Epstein; Anjali V Desai; Camila Bernal; Danielle Romano; Peter J Wan; Molly Okpako; Kelly Anderson; Kimberly Chow; Dana Kramer; Claudia Calderon; Virginia V Klimek; Robin Rawlins-Duell; Diane L Reidy; Jessica I Goldberg; Elizabeth Cruz; Judith E Nelson Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Miguel Julião; Maria Ana Sobral; Paula Calçada; Bárbara Antunes; Daniela Runa; Catarina Samorinha; Harvey Max Chochinov; William Breitbart Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2021-08
Authors: Loredana Buonaccorso; Gianfranco Martucci; Guido Miccinesi; Alice Maruelli; Carla Ripamonti Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 3.603