Literature DB >> 25527420

The elementary fusion modalities of osteoclasts.

Kent Søe1, Anne-Sofie Hobolt-Pedersen2, Jean-Marie Delaisse3.   

Abstract

The last step of the osteoclast differentiation process is cell fusion. Most efforts to understand the fusion mechanism have focused on the identification of molecules involved in the fusion process. Surprisingly, the basic fusion modalities, which are well known for fusion of other cell types, are not known for the osteoclast. Here we show that osteoclast fusion partners are characterized by differences in mobility, nuclearity, and differentiation level. Our demonstration was based on time-laps videos of human osteoclast preparations from three donors where 656 fusion events were analyzed. Fusions between a mobile and an immobile partner were most frequent (62%), while fusion between two mobile (26%) or two immobile partners (12%) was less frequent (p<0.001). In general, the immobile fusion partner contained more nuclei than the mobile one (p<0.01). Furthermore, enrichment in nuclei of an osteoclast with three or more nuclei resulted from fusion with a mono-nucleated cell in 67% of the cases (p<0.001), while mono-nucleated cells fused with a multinucleated cell in 61% of the cases (p<0.05). This observation suggested that a more mature osteoclast prefers to fuse with a less mature pre-osteoclast. This hypothesis was supported by a nucleus-tracing approach in a co-culture of more and less differentiated pre-osteoclasts/osteoclasts. Furthermore, we found that osteoclast fusion proceeds through primarily two different types of cell contacts: phagocytic-cup and broad-contact-surfaces (>80% of all fusions). We conclude that osteoclasts most often gain nuclei by addition of one nucleus at a time, and that this nucleus is most often delivered by a moving cell to an immobile cell. These characteristics fit the in vivo observations where mono-nucleated precursors migrating from the bone marrow fuse with more mature osteoclasts sitting on the bone surface. They also fit the fusion modalities of other cell types.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusion; Fusion partner; Heterogeneity; Mobility; Osteoclast fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527420     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  23 in total

Review 1.  DC-STAMP: A Key Regulator in Osteoclast Differentiation.

Authors:  Ya-Hui Chiu; Christopher T Ritchlin
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.384

2.  Suppression of Notch Signaling in Osteoclasts Improves Bone Regeneration and Healing.

Authors:  Peeyush N Goel; Yasaman Moharrer; John H Hebb; Alexander J Egol; Gurpreet Kaur; Kurt D Hankenson; Jaimo Ahn; Jason W Ashley
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Dendritic Cell-Specific Transmembrane Protein (DC-STAMP) Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation via the Ca2+ /NFATc1 Axis.

Authors:  Ya-Hui Chiu; Edward Schwarz; Dongge Li; Yuexin Xu; Tzong-Ren Sheu; Jinbo Li; Karen L de Mesy Bentley; Changyong Feng; Baoli Wang; Jhih-Cheng Wang; Liz Albertorio-Saez; Ronald Wood; Minsoo Kim; Wensheng Wang; Christopher T Ritchlin
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 4.  The origins and roles of osteoclasts in bone development, homeostasis and repair.

Authors:  Yasuhito Yahara; Tuyet Nguyen; Koji Ishikawa; Katsuhiko Kamei; Benjamin A Alman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.862

5.  An SNX10-dependent mechanism downregulates fusion between mature osteoclasts.

Authors:  Maayan Barnea-Zohar; Sabina E Winograd-Katz; Moran Shalev; Esther Arman; Nina Reuven; Lee Roth; Ofra Golani; Merle Stein; Fadi Thalji; Moien Kanaan; Jan Tuckermann; Benjamin Geiger; Ari Elson
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Studies of OC-STAMP in Osteoclast Fusion: A New Knockout Mouse Model, Rescue of Cell Fusion, and Transmembrane Topology.

Authors:  Hanna Witwicka; Sung-Yong Hwang; Pablo Reyes-Gutierrez; Hong Jia; Paul E Odgren; Leah Rae Donahue; Mark J Birnbaum; Paul R Odgren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Symmetrical retrograde actin flow in the actin fusion structure is involved in osteoclast fusion.

Authors:  Jiro Takito; Hirotada Otsuka; Satoshi Inoue; Tsubasa Kawashima; Masanori Nakamura
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  CD13 is a critical regulator of cell-cell fusion in osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Mallika Ghosh; Tomislav Kelava; Ivana Vrhovac Madunic; Ivo Kalajzic; Linda H Shapiro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  An improved metrics for osteoclast multinucleation.

Authors:  Santosh K Verma; Leonid V Chernomordik; Kamran Melikov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Osteoclast Multinucleation: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Joe Kodama; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.