Literature DB >> 25527402

Effectiveness and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with previous laminectomy.

Hossein Elgafy1, Doug Olson, Jiayong Liu, Caitlin Lewis, Hassan Semaan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for revision lumbar spine surgery in patients with previous laminectomy. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome after such a procedure.
METHODS: Retrospective case series study. Eighty-two patients were included. There were 48 women (58.5 %) and 34 men (41.5 %) with a mean age of 51 years (range 26-84) at the time of index procedure. The outpatient and inpatient charts were reviewed to identify patients' demographic data, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data. The outcome measures were assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. An independent spine surgeon and musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the imaging studies.
RESULTS: The average operative time was 160 min (range 131-250). The average estimated blood loss was 652 cc (100-1,400 cc). Nineteen patients (23.1 %) required blood transfusion. Five patients (6 %) had dural tear. One patient (1.2 %) had a surgical site infection. Two patients (2.4 %) had thromboembolic events. The average hospital stay was 3.8 days (2-5 days). At a mean follow-up of 28 months, there were statically significant improvement in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain. None of the patients' radiographs showed hardware failure or pedicle screw loosening and no patient returned to the operating room for pseudarthrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirmed that TLIF approach in patients with previous laminectomy is effective and safe with good outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527402     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3726-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Incidental durotomy in spine surgery.

Authors:  F P Cammisa; F P Girardi; P K Sangani; H K Parvataneni; S Cadag; H S Sandhu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: incidence and management.

Authors:  Suhayl I Tafazal; Philip J Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Retrograde ejaculation after retroperitoneal lower lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  F B Christensen; C E Bünger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review.

Authors:  Jim A Youssef; Paul C McAfee; Catherine A Patty; Erin Raley; Spencer DeBauche; Erin Shucosky; Liana Chotikul
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Kong Hwee Lee; Wai Mun Yue; William Yeo; Henry Soeharno; Seang Beng Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Failed back surgery syndrome: diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  Richard D Guyer; Michael Patterson; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Contralateral psoas seroma after transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein-2 implantation.

Authors:  Fadi Taher; Darren R Lebl; Alexander P Hughes; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Salvador A Brau; Rick B Delamarter; Michael L Schiffman; Lytton A Williams; Robert G Watkins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management.

Authors:  Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association between insurance status and patient safety in the lumbar spine fusion population.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Vincent J Alentado; Jacob A Miller; Daniel Lubelski; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Burden of Surgical Site Infections Associated with Select Spine Operations and Involvement of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Harshila Patel; Hanane Khoury; Douglas Girgenti; Sharon Welner; Holly Yu
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.150

3.  Clinical outcomes of two types of cages used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: n-HA/PA66 cages versus PEEK cages.

Authors:  Qian-xing Deng; Yun-sheng Ou; Yong Zhu; Zeng-hui Zhao; Bo Liu; Qiu Huang; Xing Du; Dian-ming Jiang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.896

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.