Literature DB >> 2552740

Prenatal Rh-immune prophylaxis with 300 micrograms immune globulin anti-D in the 28th week of pregnancy.

B Trolle1.   

Abstract

As immune globulin anti-D given in the immediate post partum period fails to prevent the development of anti-D antibodies in about 1.5-2% of women at risk, probably as a result of feto-maternal bleeding during pregnancy, 300 micrograms of immune globulin anti-D was administered to 609 Rh-negative women in the 28th gestational week. Three hundred and forty-six had Rh-positive babies, and were given additionally 200 micrograms anti-D post partum. Of these, 291 had an antibody screen test done 10 months after delivery. No anti-D antibodies were found. The test results of the study group were compared with those of a control group of 354 women who did not receive prenatal immune globulin, but otherwise the same examinations and treatment. In this group, 322 had a screen test performed 10 months post partum or in their next pregnancy, when 1.8% had anti-D antibodies. The difference in immunization incidence between the groups was significant (p less than 0.05). There was no difference between the groups regarding the number of women with fetal erythrocytes in serum after delivery, but the number of fetal erythrocytes found was significantly lower in the group receiving prenatal prophylaxis (p less than 0.001). No adverse effects were found in the infants exposed to anti-D prenatally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2552740     DOI: 10.3109/00016348909087688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of antenatal immunoprophylaxis in the prevention of maternal-foetal anti-Rh(D) alloimmunisation.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Angelo D'Alessandro; Federica Rea; Vanessa Piccinini; Liviana Catalano; Gabriele Calizzani; Simonetta Pupella; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  The history of rhesus prophylaxis with anti-D.

Authors:  A Wegmann; R Glück
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in women who are Rh(D) negative: meta-analyses adjusted for differences in study design and quality.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones; Dilly O C Anumba; Gordon C S Smith; David J Spiegelhalter; Hazel Squires; John W Stevens; Michael J Sweeting; Stanislaw J Urbaniak; Robert Webster; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohui Xie; Qiurong Fu; Ziwei Bao; Yi Zhang; Dan Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bias modelling in evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; David J Spiegelhalter; Gordon C S Smith; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.483

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.