BACKGROUND: Collection of data on race, ethnicity, and language preference is required as part of the "meaningful use" of electronic health records (EHRs). These data serve as a foundation for interventions to reduce health disparities. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the accuracy of EHR-recorded data on race, ethnicity, and language preference to that reported directly by patients. DESIGN/SUBJECTS/MAIN MEASURES: Data collected as part of a tobacco cessation intervention for minority and low-income smokers across a network of 13 primary care clinics (n = 569). KEY RESULTS: Patients were more likely to self-report Hispanic ethnicity (19.6 % vs. 16.6 %, p < 0.001) and African American race (27.0 % vs. 20.4 %, p < 0.001) than was reported in the EHR. Conversely, patients were less likely to complete the survey in Spanish than the language preference noted in the EHR suggested (5.1 % vs. 6.3 %, p < 0.001). Thirty percent of whites self-reported identification with at least one other racial or ethnic group, as did 37.0 % of Hispanics, and 41.0 % of African Americans. Over one-third of EHR-documented Spanish speakers elected to take the survey in English. One-fifth of individuals who took the survey in Spanish were recorded in the EHR as English-speaking. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate important inaccuracies and the need for better processes to document race/ ethnicity and language preference in EHRs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Collection of data on race, ethnicity, and language preference is required as part of the "meaningful use" of electronic health records (EHRs). These data serve as a foundation for interventions to reduce health disparities. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the accuracy of EHR-recorded data on race, ethnicity, and language preference to that reported directly by patients. DESIGN/SUBJECTS/MAIN MEASURES: Data collected as part of a tobacco cessation intervention for minority and low-income smokers across a network of 13 primary care clinics (n = 569). KEY RESULTS:Patients were more likely to self-report Hispanic ethnicity (19.6 % vs. 16.6 %, p < 0.001) and African American race (27.0 % vs. 20.4 %, p < 0.001) than was reported in the EHR. Conversely, patients were less likely to complete the survey in Spanish than the language preference noted in the EHR suggested (5.1 % vs. 6.3 %, p < 0.001). Thirty percent of whites self-reported identification with at least one other racial or ethnic group, as did 37.0 % of Hispanics, and 41.0 % of African Americans. Over one-third of EHR-documented Spanish speakers elected to take the survey in English. One-fifth of individuals who took the survey in Spanish were recorded in the EHR as English-speaking. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate important inaccuracies and the need for better processes to document race/ ethnicity and language preference in EHRs.
Authors: Carmen N West; Ann M Geiger; Sarah M Greene; Emily L Harris; In-Lu A Liu; Mary B Barton; Joann G Elmore; Sharon Rolnick; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Andrea Altschuler; Lisa J Herrinton; Suzanne W Fletcher; Karen M Emmons Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2005
Authors: Cheryl R Clark; Jane Soukup; Usha Govindarajulu; Heather E Riden; Dora A Tovar; Paula A Johnson Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Maria Staroselsky; Lynn A Volk; Ruslana Tsurikova; Lisa Pizziferri; Margaret Lippincott; Jonathan Wald; David W Bates Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2005-12-09 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Jeffrey A Linder; Nancy A Rigotti; Phyllis Brawarsky; Emily Z Kontos; Elyse R Park; Elissa V Klinger; Lucas Marinacci; Wenjun Li; Jennifer S Haas Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Adrian Wong; Diane L Seger; Kenneth H Lai; Foster R Goss; Kimberly G Blumenthal; Li Zhou Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2018-12-01
Authors: Evan T Sholle; Laura C Pinheiro; Prakash Adekkanattu; Marcos A Davila; Stephen B Johnson; Jyotishman Pathak; Sanjai Sinha; Cassidie Li; Stasi A Lubansky; Monika M Safford; Thomas R Campion Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Nathaniel D Mercaldo; Kyle B Brothers; David S Carrell; Ellen W Clayton; John J Connolly; Ingrid A Holm; Carol R Horowitz; Gail P Jarvik; Terrie E Kitchner; Rongling Li; Catherine A McCarty; Jennifer B McCormick; Valerie D McManus; Melanie F Myers; Joshua J Pankratz; Martha J Shrubsole; Maureen E Smith; Sarah C Stallings; Janet L Williams; Jonathan S Schildcrout Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Patrice Jordan Fleming; Yongyun Shin; Ken Resnicow; Resa M Jones; Susan A Flocke; Deirdre A Shires; Sarah T Hawley; David Willens; Jennifer Elston Lafata Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Christine M Gunn; Amy Fitzpatrick; Sarah Waugh; Michelle Carrera; Nancy R Kressin; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 5.128