Literature DB >> 25527129

A mathematical simulation to assess variability in lung nodule size measurement associated with nodule-slice position.

Krishna Juluru1, Noor Al Khori, Sha He, Amy Kuceyeski, John Eng.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the variance and error in nodule diameter measurement associated with variations in nodule-slice position in cross-sectional imaging. A computer program utilizing a standard geometric model was used to simulate theoretical slices through a perfectly spherical nodule of known size, position, and density within a background of "lung" of known fixed density. Assuming a threshold density, partial volume effect of a voxel was simulated using published slice and pixel sensitivity profiles. At a given slice thickness and nodule size, 100 scans were simulated differing only in scan start position, then repeated for multiple node sizes at three simulated slice thicknesses. Diameter was measured using a standard, automated algorithm. The frequency of measured diameters was tabulated; average errors and standard deviations (SD) were calculated. For a representative 5-mm nodule, average measurement error ranged from +10 to -23% and SD ranged from 0.07 to 0.99 mm at slice thicknesses of 0.75 to 5 mm, respectively. At fixed slice thickness, average error and SD decreased from peak values as nodule size increased. At fixed nodule size, SD increased as slice thickness increased. Average error exhibited dependence on both slice thickness and threshold. Variance and error in nodule diameter measurement associated with nodule-slice position exists due to geometrical limitations. This can lead to false interpretations of nodule growth or stability that could affect clinical management. The variance is most pronounced at higher slice thicknesses and for small nodule sizes. Measurement error is slice thickness and threshold dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25527129      PMCID: PMC4441698          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9753-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  13 in total

1.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society.

Authors:  Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Dong Ming Xu; Hester Gietema; Harry de Koning; René Vernhout; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Mathias Prokop; Carla Weenink; Jan-Willem Lammers; Harry Groen; Matthijs Oudkerk; Rob van Klaveren
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 3.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Lisa M Kinnard; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Role of baseline nodule density and changes in density and nodule features in the discrimination between benign and malignant solid indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Dong Ming Xu; Rob J van Klaveren; Geertruida H de Bock; Anne L M Leusveld; Monique D Dorrius; Yingru Zhao; Ying Wang; Harry J de Koning; Ernst T Scholten; Johny Verschakelen; Mathias Prokop; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Increased mean lung density: another independent predictor of lung cancer?

Authors:  Nicola Sverzellati; Giorgia Randi; Paolo Spagnolo; Alfonso Marchianò; Mario Silva; Jan-Martin Kuhnigk; Carlo La Vecchia; Maurizio Zompatori; Ugo Pastorino
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Katharina Marten; Christoph Engelke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Measurement of tumor volumes improves RECIST-based response assessments in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  P David Mozley; Claus Bendtsen; Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Matthias Thorn; Yuanxin Rong; Luduan Zhang; Andrea Perrone; René Korn; Andrew J Buckler
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Dong Ming Xu; Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen; Matthijs Oudkerk; Ying Wang; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Ernst T Scholten; Johny Verschakelen; Mathias Prokop; Harry J de Koning; Rob J van Klaveren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  A resource for the assessment of lung nodule size estimation methods: database of thoracic CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Lisa M Kinnard; Kyle J Myers; Jennifer Peregoy; William F Pritchard; Rongping Zeng; Juan Esparza; John Karanian; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic feasibility and safety of CT-guided core biopsy for lung nodules less than or equal to 8 mm: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Ying-Yueh Chang; Chun-Ku Chen; Yi-Chen Yeh; Mei-Han Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.