Literature DB >> 25526851

[Prostate cancer detection rates: comparison of standard biopsy with prompt rebiopsy and a one-time extended biopsy].

Z Türk1, H Hollberg, T Dill, I Kaspers, H Isbarn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsy is the gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer (PCA). While national and international guidelines recommend the extraction of 10-12 cores at initial biopsy, some authors plead to initially perform more extensive biopsy protocols. We assessed the PCA detection and complication rates of different biopsy schemes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on the data of 425 men who underwent their first prostate biopsy from April 2005 to May 2013. Exclusion criteria consisted of PSA > 20 ng/ml, prior surgery of the prostate, or intake of 5-α-reductase inhibitors. Overall 357 underwent a 10- to 12-core biopsy, while 68 patients underwent 20-core biopsy. In case of a negative biopsy in the 10-12 cohort, rebiopsy was performed within 6 months, while in the 20-core group clinical follow-up determined further course of action. Endpoints of the study were the overall PCA detection rate and the rate of severe complications, which were defined as complications requiring hospital admission. The effect of the respective biopsy scheme on the PCA detection rate was assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the subanalysis, the PCA detection rates between the two groups were compared solely in patients with PSA values ≤10 ng/ml.
RESULTS: At initial biopsy, the overall PCA detection rate was 50.4% (214/425). In the 10-12 core group, the PCA detection rate at first biopsy was 52.4% (187/357) and rebiopsy detected a further 19 (11.2%) PCA cases, resulting in a cumulative PCA detection rate of 57.7% (206/357). In the 20-core group, the PCA detection rate was 39.7% (27/68). While the different PCA detection rates were not statistically different when the initial biopsies were compared, biopsy scheme reached independent predictor status when the cumulative PCA detection rate of the 10- to 12-core scheme was compared to the 20-core scheme (p=0.01). Comparable results were obtained only when patients with PSA ≤10 ng/ml were considered. The rate of severe complications was statistically higher in the 20-core group (6.1 vs. 2.4%; p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that an initial 20-core biopsy does not lead to a higher PCA detection rate compared to an initial 10- to 12-core biopsy. Moreover, the cumulative PCA detection rate of a 10- to 12-core biopsy and prompt repeat biopsy was significantly higher compared to a single 20-core biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25526851     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3648-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  8 in total

1.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Patrick J Bastian; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Theodor van der Kwast; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Thomas Wiegel; F Zattoni; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Is an initial saturation prostate biopsy scheme better than an extended scheme for detection of prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xingkang Jiang; Shimiao Zhu; Guowei Feng; Zhihong Zhang; Changying Li; Hui Li; Chao Wang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaus Eichler; Susanne Hempel; Jennifer Wilby; Lindsey Myers; Lucas M Bachmann; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Initial extended transrectal prostate biopsy--are more prostate cancers detected with 18 cores than with 12 cores?

Authors:  Vincenzo Scattoni; Marco Roscigno; Marco Raber; Federico Dehò; Tommaso Maga; Matteo Zanoni; Matteo Riva; Mattia Sangalli; Luciano Nava; Bruno Mazzoccoli; Massimo Freschi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prostate cancer detection at repeat biopsy: can pelvic phased-array multiparametric MRI replace saturation biopsy?

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Antonio Garufi; Giandomenico Priolo; Giuseppe Candiano; Francesco Pietropaolo; Michele Pennisi; Filippo Fraggetta; Francesco Aragona
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  PSA response to finasteride challenge in men with a serum PSA greater than 4 ng/ml and previous negative prostate biopsy: preliminary study.

Authors:  Steven A Kaplan; Mohamed A Ghafar; Michael A Volpe; John S Lam; Debra Fromer; Alexis E Te
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Mehsati Herawi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Characterization of ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli isolates among men undergoing evaluation for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Chao Qi; Michael Malczynski; Anthony J Schaeffer; Grace Barajas; Robert B Nadler; Marc H Scheetz; Teresa R Zembower
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 7.450

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Detecting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Christian von Bodman; Jüri Palisaar; Wolfgang Becker; Philipp Martin-Seidel; Joachim Noldus
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.594

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.