Literature DB >> 25526587

Safety evaluation of freehand lateral mass screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: evaluation of 1256 screws.

Hak-Sun Kim1, Kyung-Soo Suk, Seong-Hwan Moon, Hwan-Mo Lee, Kyung Chung Kang, Sang-Hun Lee, Jin-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of the lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LMS fixation has been known to have risk of injury to vertebral artery, nerve root, or facet joints.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 178 patients undergoing planned LMS fixation were studied. Screw fixation was performed using the freehand technique. Entry point of screws was 2-mm medial from the center of the lateral mass. Planned divergent angle of the screw was 30º. Bicortical fixation was tried in all cases. After the surgery, all patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomographic scan of the cervical spine. We checked the number of screws in each level, divergent angle of the screws, and violation of foramen transversarium (FT), intervertebral foramen, or facet joint by screws. A reliability test was performed.
RESULTS: Total 1256 screws were fixed with 269 at C3, 318 at C4, 331 at C5, and 338 screws at C6. Mean divergent angle of the screws were 34.7º/33.1º at C3, 33.9 º/32.1º at C4, 34.7º/32.7º at C5, and 33.6º/30.7º at C6. Incidence of FT violation was 0.876%. FT violation was most common at C6 (6/11 violations). Mean divergent angle in cases of FT violation was 15.0º and was significantly smaller than that of safe cases. There was no injury to vertebral artery. There was no violation of intervertebral foramen. Incidence of facet violation was 1.433%. Seventeen facet violations were within fusion segment. Only 1 screw violated healthy facet. Facet violation was most common at C3 (12/18 violations).
CONCLUSION: LMS fixation is a safe stabilizing technique with very low incidence of violation of FT, intervertebral foramen, and facet. There is a possibility of FT violation if the divergent angle was small. FT violation was most common at C6. Facet violation was most common at C3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25526587     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Sub-axial Cervical Lateral Mass Screw Fixation on Functional Outcome in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Ali Rabee Kamel Hamdan; Radwan Nouby Mahmoud; Momen Mohammed Al Mamoun; Eslam El Sayed El Khateeb
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

2.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty with unilateral or bilateral fixation and fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a multi-center prospective study.

Authors:  Nan Su; Qi Fei; Bing-Qiang Wang; Nan Kang; Qing-Ming Zhang; He-Hu Tang; Dong Li; Jin-Jun Li; Yong Yang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  Development and Achievement of Cervical Laminoplasty and Related Studies on Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Shigeru Hirabayashi; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Iwao Yamamoto; Kazuaki Yamada; Hirotaka Kawano
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-07-10

4.  A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Colby Oitment; Patrick Thornley; Frank Koziarz; Thorsten Jentzsch; Kunal Bhanot
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-01-12

5.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of modified open-door laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fusion in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Nan Su; Qi Fei; Bingqiang Wang; Dong Li; Jinjun Li; Hai Meng; Yong Yang; Ai Guo
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.