BACKGROUND: Discussing preferred place of death (PPD) with patients approaching end of life is an important part of anticipatory care planning. Preferences at a specific point in time have been described; however the extent to which preferences may change is unclear. This study examines changes in PPD. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of all patients who died under the care of a specialist palliative care service during a 6-month period in 2012 was undertaken. Notes relating to 299 patients were examined by a member of the clinical team. RESULTS: Of the 204 patients who had more than one PPD assessment, 57% showed a change in preference status between the first and last assessment. The majority changed from an unclarified preference to identifying a preferred place. Only 15% of patients with two or more assessments switched from one location to another. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients under the care of a specialist palliative care service identify a preference for place of death as end of life approaches. Only a minority change their preference once a preferred place has been elicited. We recommend that patients are supported to explore their preferences for PPD as part of specialist palliative care, and that preferences are reviewed as end of life approaches.
BACKGROUND: Discussing preferred place of death (PPD) with patients approaching end of life is an important part of anticipatory care planning. Preferences at a specific point in time have been described; however the extent to which preferences may change is unclear. This study examines changes in PPD. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of all patients who died under the care of a specialist palliative care service during a 6-month period in 2012 was undertaken. Notes relating to 299 patients were examined by a member of the clinical team. RESULTS: Of the 204 patients who had more than one PPD assessment, 57% showed a change in preference status between the first and last assessment. The majority changed from an unclarified preference to identifying a preferred place. Only 15% of patients with two or more assessments switched from one location to another. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients under the care of a specialist palliative care service identify a preference for place of death as end of life approaches. Only a minority change their preference once a preferred place has been elicited. We recommend that patients are supported to explore their preferences for PPD as part of specialist palliative care, and that preferences are reviewed as end of life approaches.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advance care planning; Change in preference; End of life; Home care; Hospice care; Preferred place of death
Authors: Steven M Albert; June R Lunney; Lei Ye; Robert Boudreau; Diane Ives; Suzanne Satterfield; Cameron M Kaplan; Teresa Waters; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Susan M Rubin; Anne B Newman; Tamara Harris Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Rebecca Sheridan; Eve Roman; Alex G Smith; Andrew Turner; Anne C Garry; Russell Patmore; Martin R Howard; Debra A Howell Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 3.568