Literature DB >> 25526035

Three-dimensional ultrasound-based image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results of a consecutive case series.

Umberto Ricardi1, Pierfrancesco Franco, Fernando Munoz, Mario Levis, Christian Fiandra, Alessia Guarneri, Francesco Moretto, Sara Bartoncini, Francesca Arcadipane, Serena Badellino, Cristina Piva, Elisabetta Trino, Andrea Ruggieri, Andrea Riccardo Filippi, Riccardo Ragona.   

Abstract

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a standard of care in the treatment of prostate cancer. Hypofractionation is a valid option either radiobiologically and logistically in this context. Image-guidance procedures are strongly needed to provide ballistic precision to radiation delivery. The Clarity platform allows for the acquisition of three-dimensional ultrasound scans (3D-US) to perform image-guided radiotherapy. We treated a consecutive series of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients (according to NCCN stratification) with a hypofractionated schedule (70.2 Gy/26 fractions at 2.7 Gy/daily to the prostate gland excluding the seminal vesicles at 62.1 Gy) under 3D-US guidance with the Clarity platform. The 3-year biochemical-relapse-free survival, distant-metastases-free, cancer-specific and overall survival were 98.6% (CI: 91.1-99.6%), 98.6% (CI: 91.1-99.6%), 97.5% (CI: 94.5-99.1%), and 94.3% (CI: 90.4-96.7%), respectively. Maximum detected acute GU toxicity was G0 in 22 patients (29.7%), G1 in 30 (22.7%), G2 in 19 (25.6%), G3 in 3 (4%). Maximum detected acute GI toxicity at the end of EBRT was G0 in 42 patients (56.8%), G1 in 22 (29.7%), G2 in 9 (12.1%), G3 in 1 (1.4%). The 3-year actuarial rates of ≥ G2 late toxicities were 6.1% for genito-urinary and 8.9% for gastrointestinal. The whole image-guidance workflow resulted in being robust and reliable. EBRT delivered employing a hypofractionated schedule under 3D-US-based image guidance proved to be a safe and effective treatment approach with consistent biochemical control and a mild toxicity profile. Hence, it has been transferred into daily clinical practice in our Department.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D Ultrasounds; Clarity; Hypofractionation; IGRT; Prostate cancer Radiotherapy; Radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25526035     DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2014.988343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of interfraction setup error, patient comfort, and therapist acceptance for 2 different prostate radiation therapy immobilization devices.

Authors:  Eric Pei Ping Pang; Kellie Knight; Marilyn Baird; Joshua Ming Quan Loh; Adelene Hwee San Boo; Jeffrey Kit Loong Tuan
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-02-16

2.  Using Cherenkov imaging to monitor the match line between photon and electron radiation therapy fields on biological tissue phantoms.

Authors:  Yi Li; Hongjun Liu; Nan Huang; Zhaolu Wang; Chunmin Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Intrafractional Tracking Accuracy of a Transperineal Ultrasound Image Guidance System for Prostate Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dimitre H Hristov; Tiffany Phillips; Amy S Yu; Mohammad Najafi
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-21

Review 4.  The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in the External Beam Radiotherapy Workflow of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Saskia M Camps; Davide Fontanarosa; Peter H N de With; Frank Verhaegen; Ben G L Vanneste
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Feasibility study of ultrasound imaging for stereotactic body radiation therapy with active breathing coordinator in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Lin Su; Iulian Iordachita; Yin Zhang; Junghoon Lee; Sook Kien Ng; Juan Jackson; Ted Hooker; John Wong; Joseph M Herman; H Tutkun Sen; Peter Kazanzides; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Chen Yang; Kai Ding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.