Literature DB >> 25525546

A case of urethral duplication arising from the posterior urethra to the scrotum with urinary stone in a 6-year-old male.

Kenichi Mori1, Toshitaka Shin1, Shohei Tobu2, Mitsuru Noguchi2, Yasuhiro Sumino1, Fuminoi Sato1, Hiromitsu Mimata1.   

Abstract

Urethral duplication is a rare congenital anomaly. We report a 6-year-old male with type IIA2 (Y-type) using Effmann's classification. The accessory urethra, in which a urinary stone existed, arose from the posterior urethra to the scrotum. Because of recurrent urinary tract infection and urinary discharge from the accessory urethra, surgical removal of the accessory urethra through a scrotal incision was performed. At 7-month postoperative follow-up the patient was completely free from urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25525546      PMCID: PMC4261629          DOI: 10.1155/2014/290623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Pediatr


1. Introduction

Patients with urethral duplication, an extremely rare congenital anomaly, can present with incontinence, urinary tract infection (UTI), and double stream or can be asymptomatic with the duplication being found on routine physical examination [1]. We report a 6-year-old male with scrotal sinus as a variant of urethral duplication arising from the posterior urethra to the scrotum.

2. Case Report

A 6-year-old boy with a history of pale yellow discharge from the opening of the sinus and a stony excrescence of the sinus in the midline scrotum was evaluated (Figure 1(a)). Other physical findings were normal. However, urine analysis showed slight pyuria. Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrated communication between the sinus and the posterior urethra and right grade I vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) (Figure 1(b)). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging also revealed communication between the sinus and posterior urethra. As a result of examination, urethral duplication arising from the posterior urethra to the scrotum was mostly suspected as the clinical diagnosis.
Figure 1

(a) The opening of the sinus with urinary stone (arrowhead) in the midline scrotum. (b) VCUG demonstrated the accessory urethra arising from the posterior urethra to the scrotum (arrowheads) and right grade I VUR (arrow). (c) The 4.5 cm long accessory urethra (arrowheads) was removed through a scrotal incision. White arrow was the junction of posterior urethra and accessory urethra. (d) The sinus lumen was lined by squamous epithelium with keratinization (arrowheads). Capillary vessels and smooth muscle tissue were observed in subepithelium (HE, ×200).

Cystourethroscopy, retrograde urethrography (RUG), sinus graphy, and surgical removal of the sinus through a scrotal incision were performed simultaneously. The patient was placed in lithotomy position. An elliptic incision was accomplished in the skin around the opening and the surrounding tissues were delicately dissected up to near the bifurcation of the urethra. The ectopic channel received double ligation with 3-0 polyglactin, and it was excised. The subcutaneous tissue was closed with 4-0 polyglactin 910 and the skin was sutured with 4-0 polydioxanone. The 4.5 cm long sinus extended to the left side of the verumontanum (Figure 1(c)). No posterior urethral membrane was involved in the urethral obstruction. Histologically, the sinus lumen was lined by squamous epithelium and surrounded by smooth muscle and capillary vessels (Figure 1(d)). Based on this result, the sinus was finally diagnosed as an accessory urethra of urethral duplication [2].

3. Discussion

Urethral duplication is a rare anomaly with about 300 cases reported to date, usually seen in males and often associated with genitourinary and gastrointestinal anomalies [3]. Urethral duplication can be classified into three types using Effmann's classification [4]. One-third of patients have associated VUR. In type I, the most common type, partial duplication of the urethra is observed and is almost always asymptomatic, requiring no treatment. In type II, complete duplication of the urethra is observed. Type II urethral duplication can be classified as type IIA1 if both urethras arise from the separate bladder necks, type IIA2 (Y-type duplication) if one channel arises from the other, and type IIB if duplication with one meatus is observed. Type III urethral duplication comprises complete duplication of the urethra and bladder. Embryonically, urethral duplication is not well understood and various hypotheses exist. Urethral duplication can be caused by the growth arrest of the urogenital sinus [5] or abnormal Müllerian duct termination or misalignment of the termination of the cloacal membrane with genital tubercle [6]. Depending on duplication type, patients may be asymptomatic. Symptoms include UTI, epididymitis, and incontinence [7]. Diagnosis can be made using VCUG or RUG. Urodynamic study helps to confirm the position of the functional urethra to distinguish it from congenital urethroperineal fistula. Our case was classified as type IIA2 (Y-type) because of the accessory urethra arising from the posterior urethra to the scrotum. In almost all cases of Y-type, the accessory urethras were opened on the perineum or rectum arising from orthotropic urethra. The primary aim of surgical repair of Y-type urethral duplication is to preserve normal functioning orthotopic urethra with intact verumontanum, good caliber, and intact sphincter [8]. Surgical management should be planned individually according to the anatomical findings of the abnormality. In this case, because of recurrent UTI and urinary discharge from the accessory urethra, surgical removal of the accessory urethra through a scrotal incision was performed. At 7-month postoperative follow-up the patient was completely free from urinary incontinence, UTI, and VUR. In conclusion, urethral duplication is a rare congenital anomaly, either isolated or associated with other anomalies, with varied presentations and requires radiologic and also endoscopic examination to define the anatomy and planning of the surgical approach.
  8 in total

1.  Congenital prepubic sinus: a variant of dorsal urethral duplication (Stephens type 3).

Authors:  Masayuki Usami; Yutaro Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Tetsuji Maruyama; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.369

2.  Urethral duplication with a perineal opening in a four-year-old boy.

Authors:  Linus I Okeke; Oseremen I Aisuodionoe-Shadrach; Adedeji O Adekanye
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Duplication of the urethra.

Authors:  E L Effmann; R L Lebowitz; A H Colodny
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Urethral duplication in the male: review of 16 cases.

Authors:  J L Salle; H Sibai; D Rosenstein; A E Brzezinski; J Corcos
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Urethral duplication in children: our experience of eight cases.

Authors:  S B Mane; Abu Obaidah; Nitin P Dhende; Jamir Arlikar; Himanshu Acharya; Ashokanand Thakur; Suyodhan Reddy
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  Y-type urethral duplication in the male.

Authors:  George Haleblian; David Kraklau; Duncan Wilcox; Patrick Duffy; Philip Ransley; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Urethral duplication: Experience of four cases.

Authors:  Raghu S Ramareddy; Anand Alladi; O S Siddappa
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 8.  Congenital anomalies of the male urethra.

Authors:  Terry L Levin; Bokyung Han; Brent P Little
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Urethral duplication in a child with VATER association.

Authors:  R B Nerli; Shridhar C Ghagane; Neeraj S Dixit; Murigendra B Hiremath
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2018-11-29

2.  Type IIB urethral duplication in young adult-A case report.

Authors:  Naqibullah Foladi; Mohammad Javid Karimy
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-02

3.  Complete Urethral Duplication: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Mohammed Suoub; Mohammad M Saleem; Fadi Sawaqed
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2020-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.