| Literature DB >> 25525457 |
Takakazu Oka1, Tokusei Tanahashi1, Takeharu Chijiwa1, Battuvshin Lkhagvasuren1, Nobuyuki Sudo1, Kae Oka2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) often complain of persistent fatigue even after conventional therapies such as pharmacotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, or graded exercise therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate in a randomized, controlled trial the feasibility and efficacy of isometric yoga in patients with CFS who are resistant to conventional treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic fatigue syndrome; Fatigue; Fibromyalgia; Isometric yoga; Treatment
Year: 2014 PMID: 25525457 PMCID: PMC4269854 DOI: 10.1186/s13030-014-0027-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biopsychosoc Med ISSN: 1751-0759
Figure 1Flow chart outlining participation in this study.
Figure 2Illustration of the six poses of the isometric yoga program used in this study. The 20-minute isometric yoga program consisted of three parts. 1) The patients practiced being aware of their spontaneous breathing for one minute. 2) The patients practiced six isometric poses 4–6 times: (i) stretching both arms behind the back; (ii) pushing the palms against each other; (iii) pulling the palms away from each other; (iv) pushing the feet against each other; (v) pushing both knees inward with hands on the outside; and (vi) twisting. 3) The patients practiced abdominal breathing for one minute. The postures were practiced slowly in association with exhalation or inhalation with 50% of the maximal physical strength. After the postures were repeated 4–6 times, the patients decreased their physical exertion and returned slowly to the basic position while exhaling.
Demographic characteristics of the participants
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Number(m:f)# | 15(3:12) | 15(3:12) |
| Age (years)* | 38.0 ± 11.1 | 39.1 ± 14.2 |
| Chalder’s fatigue scale, Physical fatigue* | 16.4 ± 3.5 | 16.5 ± 3.4 |
| Chalder’s fatigue scale, Mental fatigue* | 9.5 ± 3.5 | 9.7 ± 3.2 |
| Chalder’s fatigue scale, Total score* | 25.9 ± 6.1 | 26.1 ± 6.2 |
The data shown are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). #Not significant by the Fisher exact probability test. *Not significant by an independent-sample t test.
Figure 3Acute effects of isometric yoga on fatigue and vigor. A comparison of the fatigue (F) and vigor (V) scores of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire for participants in the yoga group before (pre, blue) and immediately after (post, red) the final 20-minute session of isometric yoga with the instructor. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01 (paired t test).
Figure 4Chronic effects of isometric yoga on fatigue. Chalder’s Fatigue Scale (FS) subscale scores for physical symptoms (a), mental symptoms (b), and FS total scores (c) of the yoga and control groups. **P < 0.01 for differences between the pre- and post-intervention scores (paired-sample t test). # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 for differences in the scores between the yoga and control groups (independent-sample t test).
Changes in Chalder’s Fatigue Scale (FS) subscale and total scores from baseline to post-intervention of patients in the yoga group compared with the score changes of those in the control group
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Physical symptoms | |||||
| Pre-intervention | 16.4 (3.5) | 16.5 (3.4) | 0.004 | 0.779 | 0.009 |
| Post-intervention | 12.3 (3.8) | 16.1 (3.6) | |||
| Mental symptoms | |||||
| Pre-intervention | 9.5 (3.5) | 9.7 (3.2) | |||
| Post-intervention | 6.9 (4.4) | 9.7 (3.1) | 0.004 | 0.395 | 0.007 |
| Total score | |||||
| Pre-intervention | 25.9 (6.1) | 26.1 (6.2) | |||
| Post-intervention | 19.2 (7.5) | 25.8 (5.9) | 0.002 | 0.550 | 0.003 |
Tested with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by post-hoc, within-group, paired-sample t tests.
Changes in Short-Form 8 (SF-8) scores obtained before (pre-) and after (post-) the intervention for participants in the yoga group
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical functioning (PF) | 39.6 ± 9.1 | 42.5 ± 7.1 | n.s. |
| Role physical (RP) | 34.4 ± 8.4 | 38.4 ± 6.4 | n.s. |
| Bodily pain (BP) | 41.3 ± 6.7 | 48.1 ± 7.9 | P = 0.0001 |
| General health perception (GH) | 39.3 ± 5.3 | 43.6 ± 6.0 | P = 0.0021 |
| Vitality (VT) | 43.7 ± 4.9 | 43.5 ± 6.1 | n.s. |
| Social functioning (SF) | 37.6 ± 7.8 | 37.6 ± 7.8 | n.s. |
| Role emotional (RE) | 39.2 ± 12.6 | 44.4 ± 9.3 | n.s. |
| Mental health (MH) | 45.8 ± 9.5 | 46.8 ± 9.5 | n.s. |
| Physical component summary (PCS) | 35.8 ± 7.2 | 40.6 ± 4.7 | P = 0.024 |
| Mental component summary (MCS) | 44.1 ± 8.5 | 44.5 ± 7.9 | n.s. |
The data shown are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The P values assess the differences in scores between the pre- and post-intervention periods (paired-sample t test).