Seong Yong Park1, Arthur Cho2, Woo Sik Yu3, Chang Young Lee4, Jin Gu Lee4, Dae Joon Kim4, Kyung Young Chung3. 1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; and. 3. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea kychu@yuhs.ac. 4. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Despite the favorable prognosis of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the disease recurs after complete surgical resection in 20%-30% of patients. This study determined the prognostic value of various metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in surgically resected stage IA NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 248 patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy and complete lymph node dissection after PET/CT. A region of interest was drawn on the primary lesion, and metabolic indices such as metabolic tumor volume, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured using an SUV cutoff of 2.5. RESULTS: The patients included 134 men and 114 women, and the mean age was 63.03 ± 10.01 y; 129 were stage T1a (≤ 2 cm) and 119 were T1b (>2 cm). The median follow-up period was 36.6 mo. Recurrence took place in 15 patients. The mean (± SD) SUV(max), metabolic tumor volume, and TLG were 4.55 ± 3.75, 5.92 ± 5.57, and 14.42 ± 17.35, respectively. The cutoffs of SUV(max) and TLG were 3.7 and 13.76, respectively. The 5-y overall survival (OS) was 95.1% in low-SUV(max) patients and 82.2% in high-SUV(max) patients (P = 0.02). The 5-y OS was 93.7% in low-TLG patients and 78.3% in high-TLG patients (P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, TLG was a risk factor for OS (hazard ratio, 3.159; P = 0.040), but SUV(max) showed marginal significance (P = 0.064). The concordance index of the TLG model was 0.676 (95% CI, 0.541-0.812). CONCLUSION: TLG was a significant prognostic factor for OS in patients with stage IA NSCLC.
UNLABELLED: Despite the favorable prognosis of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the disease recurs after complete surgical resection in 20%-30% of patients. This study determined the prognostic value of various metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in surgically resected stage IA NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 248 patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy and complete lymph node dissection after PET/CT. A region of interest was drawn on the primary lesion, and metabolic indices such as metabolic tumor volume, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured using an SUV cutoff of 2.5. RESULTS: The patients included 134 men and 114 women, and the mean age was 63.03 ± 10.01 y; 129 were stage T1a (≤ 2 cm) and 119 were T1b (>2 cm). The median follow-up period was 36.6 mo. Recurrence took place in 15 patients. The mean (± SD) SUV(max), metabolic tumor volume, and TLG were 4.55 ± 3.75, 5.92 ± 5.57, and 14.42 ± 17.35, respectively. The cutoffs of SUV(max) and TLG were 3.7 and 13.76, respectively. The 5-y overall survival (OS) was 95.1% in low-SUV(max) patients and 82.2% in high-SUV(max) patients (P = 0.02). The 5-y OS was 93.7% in low-TLGpatients and 78.3% in high-TLGpatients (P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, TLG was a risk factor for OS (hazard ratio, 3.159; P = 0.040), but SUV(max) showed marginal significance (P = 0.064). The concordance index of the TLG model was 0.676 (95% CI, 0.541-0.812). CONCLUSION:TLG was a significant prognostic factor for OS in patients with stage IA NSCLC.
Authors: Madison R Kocher; Anand Sharma; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; James G Ravenel Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2018 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: So-Woon Kim; Young Il Kim; Bilal Mustafa; Mi-Ju Kim; Gowun Jeong; Sung-Min Ahn; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim; Seung-Mo Hong; In Ja Park Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Germán Andrés Jiménez Londoño; Ana Maria García Vicente; Jesús J Bosque; Mariano Amo-Salas; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Antonio Francisco Honguero-Martinez; Víctor M Pérez-García; Ángel María Soriano Castrejón Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Chen Liu; Teli Liu; Ning Zhang; Yiqiang Liu; Nan Li; Peng Du; Yong Yang; Ming Liu; Kan Gong; Xing Yang; Hua Zhu; Kun Yan; Zhi Yang Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 9.236