| Literature DB >> 25525101 |
Jia-Nan Xie1, Jian-Jun Guo1, Dao-Chao Jin2, Xue-Jian Wang1.
Abstract
The white-backed planthopper (WBPH), Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) is a serious pest causing grievous damage to rice plants. In the present study, inter-simple sequence repeats were employed to investigate the genetic diversity of 108 samples from 27 WBPH geographic populations in China. Ten primers were screened out with 147 amplified bands, average percentage of polymorphic bands, polymorphic information content, and marker index were 78.9, 0.456, and 6.753% respectively. The results indicated that genetic diversity was different among populations, but genetic variation was as low as 0.2% among the populations and as high as 99.8% within the same geographic population. Among the examined WBPH populations, genetic distances were weakly correlated to geographic distance, and there was no correlation between genetic identity and elevation. Cluster analysis showed that the 27 WBPH populations studied could be lumped into four clusters, with which the results of principal coordinate analysis (were almost consistent. In conclusion, the molecular genetic data demonstrated that the region consisting of Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangdong, and Guangxi was the first landing area of WBPH in its migrating process from overwintering sites to China.Entities:
Keywords: ISSR-PCR; genetic diversity; geographic population; white-backed planthopper
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25525101 PMCID: PMC5634026 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Collection sites for 27 geographic populations of WBPH in China. The abbreviations for the 27 WBPH geographic populations were as fallows: ahfy for Fengyang, Anhui; ahhs for Huangshan, Anhui; cqqj for Qianjiang, Chongqing; fjnp for Nanping, Fujian; gdhz for Huizhou, Guangdong; gxbm for Bama, Guangxi; gxdb for Debao, Guangxi; gxlz for Longzhou, Guangxi; gxss for Shangsi, Guangxi; gxyz for Yizhou, Guangxi; gzal for Anlong, Guizhou; gzhs for Huishui, Guizhou; gzjp for Jinping, Guizhou; gzsc for Shuicheng, Guizhou; gzyq for Yuqing, Guizhou; hntc for Tunchang, Hainan; hnhc for Huangchuan, Henan; hbyc for Yichang, Hubei; hnld for Loudi, Hunan; jxfc for Fengcheng, Jiangxi; scnj for Neijiang, Sichuan; ynjc for Jiangchuan, Yunnan; ynml for Menglun, Yunnan; ynpb for Pingbian, Yunnan; ynsj for Shuangjiang, Yunnan; ynsz for Shizong, Yunnan; and zjjh for Jinhua, Zhejiang.
ISSR primers and the polymorphism of their PCR products for 27 WBPH Chinese populations
| Sequence | Annealing temperature (°C) | Number of bands scored | Number of polymorphic bands | PPB (%) | PIC | MI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (GA) 8 C | 52.3 | 25 | 21 | 84 | 0.494 | 12.35 |
| (GA) 8 YG | 54 | 11 | 10 | 90.1 | 0.496 | 5.456 |
| (AG) 8 YT | 52.3 | 13 | 12 | 92.3 | 0.474 | 6.162 |
| (AG) 8 TA | 54 | 12 | 9 | 75 | 0.479 | 5.748 |
| (CA) 8 A | 51.7 | 13 | 9 | 69.2 | 0.41 | 5.33 |
| (CA) 8 RT | 51.2 | 17 | 14 | 82.4 | 0.497 | 8.449 |
| (AC) 8 YG | 54 | 14 | 9 | 64.3 | 0.373 | 5.222 |
| (AC) 8 TC | 53 | 16 | 11 | 68.8 | 0.433 | 6.928 |
| (AC) 8 ATT | 52.3 | 11 | 9 | 81.8 | 0.422 | 4.642 |
| (AC) 8 AG | 51 | 15 | 12 | 80 | 0.483 | 7.245 |
| Average | 14.7 | 11.6 | 78.9 | 0.456 | 6.753 |
Notes: Y = 1/2(C,T); R = 1/2(A,G).
Genetic diversity of Chinese WBPH geographic populations
| Geographic population list | Number of polymorphic bands | PPB (%) | Effective alleles (Ne) |
Nei’s gene diversity (
|
Shannon’s index (
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gxyz | 85 | 57.82 | 1.4286 ± 0.3952 | 0.2423 ± 0.2126 | 0.3519 ± 0.3053 |
| gxss | 97 | 65.99 | 1.4558 ± 0.3556 | 0.2662 ± 0.1964 | 0.3906 ± 0.2849 |
| gxlz | 86 | 58.5 | 1.4463 ± 0.4062 | 0.2491 ± 0.2158 | 0.3601 ± 0.3083 |
| gxdb | 83 | 56.46 | 1.3986 ± 0.3756 | 0.2304 ± 0.2073 | 0.3371 ± 0.3002 |
| gxbm | 89 | 60.54 | 1.4422 ± 0.3869 | 0.2517 ± 0.2090 | 0.3663 ± 0.3005 |
| ynpb | 85 | 57.82 | 1.4095 ± 0.3762 | 0.2364 ± 0.2070 | 0.3456 ± 0.2995 |
| ynjc | 84 | 57.14 | 1.4299 ± 0.4016 | 0.2415 ± 0.2148 | 0.3498 ± 0.3078 |
| ynml | 83 | 56.46 | 1.4095 ± 0.3870 | 0.2338 ± 0.2106 | 0.3406 ± 0.3036 |
| ynsj | 93 | 63.27 | 1.4531 ± 0.3755 | 0.2602 ± 0.2040 | 0.3798 ± 0.2942 |
| ynsz | 83 | 56.46 | 1.4340 ± 0.4104 | 0.2415 ± 0.2178 | 0.3487 ± 0.3110 |
| gzal | 90 | 61.22 | 1.4490 ± 0.3879 | 0.2551 ± 0.2089 | 0.3710 ± 0.3002 |
| gzsc | 84 | 57.14 | 1.4327 ± 0.4041 | 0.2423 ± 0.2156 | 0.3507 ± 0.3086 |
| gzhs | 84 | 57.14 | 1.4136 ± 0.3858 | 0.2364 ± 0.2100 | 0.3445 ± 0.3028 |
| gzyq | 76 | 51.7 | 1.4000 ± 0.4135 | 0.2219 ± 0.2198 | 0.3201 ± 0.3140 |
| gzjp | 88 | 59.86 | 1.4218 ± 0.3724 | 0.2440 ± 0.2050 | 0.3571 ± 0.2968 |
| cqqj | 82 | 55.78 | 1.4190 ± 0.4016 | 0.2355 ± 0.2153 | 0.3413 ± 0.3086 |
| hnld | 90 | 61.22 | 1.4517 ± 0.3904 | 0.2560 ± 0.2096 | 0.3719 ± 0.3009 |
| jxfc | 94 | 63.95 | 1.4653 ± 0.3812 | 0.2653 ± 0.2053 | 0.3863 ± 0.2951 |
| fjnp | 91 | 61.9 | 1.4449 ± 0.3787 | 0.2551 ± 0.2058 | 0.3721 ± 0.2967 |
| zjjh | 98 | 66.67 | 1.5007 ± 0.3892 | 0.2815 ± 0.2058 | 0.4078 ± 0.2940 |
| hbyc | 88 | 59.86 | 1.4354 ± 0.3858 | 0.2483 ± 0.2090 | 0.3616 ± 0.3008 |
| scnj | 99 | 67.35 | 1.5075 ± 0.3891 | 0.2849 ± 0.2052 | 0.4125 ± 0.2930 |
| gdhz | 95 | 64.63 | 1.4721 ± 0.3817 | 0.2687 ± 0.2050 | 0.3910 ± 0.2945 |
| hntc | 99 | 67.35 | 1.4993 ± 0.3828 | 0.2823 ± 0.2033 | 0.4099 ± 0.2910 |
| hnhc | 84 | 57.14 | 1.4000 ± 0.3716 | 0.2321 ± 0.2059 | 0.3400 ± 0.2986 |
| ahhs | 62 | 42.18 | 1.2966 ± 0.3667 | 0.1718 ± 0.2049 | 0.2514 ± 0.2977 |
| ahfy | 63 | 42.86 | 1.3116 ± 0.3812 | 0.1777 ± 0.2094 | 0.2588 ± 0.3025 |
Note: Values of traits are mean ± SD (standard deviation).
AMOVA in 27 populations of WBPH using 147 ISSR markers
| Source of variation | df | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 26 | 3.502 | 0.00099 | 0.2 | 0.152 |
| Within a population | 9861 | 4900.637 | 0.49598 | 99.8 | <0.001 |
Fig. 2.Cluster analysis of the 27 WBPH Chinese populations based on genetic diversity (1) (UPGMA).
Fig. 3.Cluster analysis of the 27 WBPH Chinese populations based on genetic diversity (2).
Fig. 4.PCOA of the 27 geographic populations of WBPH based on genetic diversity.
Fig. 5.Correlation analysis between genetic and geographic distances.
Fig. 6.Correlation analysis between genetic identity and elevation differences.