Literature DB >> 25524593

Improving accuracy of protein contact prediction using balanced network deconvolution.

Hai-Ping Sun1, Yan Huang, Xiao-Fan Wang, Yang Zhang, Hong-Bin Shen.   

Abstract

Residue contact map is essential for protein three-dimensional structure determination. But most of the current contact prediction methods based on residue co-evolution suffer from high false-positives as introduced by indirect and transitive contacts (i.e., residues A-B and B-C are in contact, but A-C are not). Built on the work by Feizi et al. (Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31:726-733), which demonstrated a general network model to distinguish direct dependencies by network deconvolution, this study presents a new balanced network deconvolution (BND) algorithm to identify optimized dependency matrix without limit on the eigenvalue range in the applied network systems. The algorithm was used to filter contact predictions of five widely used co-evolution methods. On the test of proteins from three benchmark datasets of the 9th critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP9), CASP10, and PSICOV (precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation) database experiments, the BND can improve the medium- and long-range contact predictions at the L/5 cutoff by 55.59% and 47.68%, respectively, without additional central processing unit cost. The improvement is statistically significant, with a P-value < 5.93 × 10(-3) in the Student's t-test. A further comparison with the ab initio structure predictions in CASPs showed that the usefulness of the current co-evolution-based contact prediction to the three-dimensional structure modeling relies on the number of homologous sequences existing in the sequence databases. BND can be used as a general contact refinement method, which is freely available at: http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/BND/.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  filter; predictor; protein structure prediction; residue co-evolution; residue contact map; transitive noise

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25524593      PMCID: PMC4439211          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  35 in total

Review 1.  Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability.

Authors:  M Michael Gromiha; S Selvaraj
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Durandal: fast exact clustering of protein decoys.

Authors:  Francois Berenger; Rojan Shrestha; Yong Zhou; David Simoncini; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Natively unstructured regions in proteins identified from contact predictions.

Authors:  Avner Schlessinger; Marco Punta; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Reconstruction of 3D structures from protein contact maps.

Authors:  Marco Vassura; Luciano Margara; Pietro Di Lena; Filippo Medri; Piero Fariselli; Rita Casadio
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8.

Authors:  Iakes Ezkurdia; Osvaldo Graña; José M G Izarzugaza; Michael L Tress
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

6.  Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information.

Authors:  O Olmea; A Valencia
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1997

7.  COFACTOR: an accurate comparative algorithm for structure-based protein function annotation.

Authors:  Ambrish Roy; Jianyi Yang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  wKinMut: an integrated tool for the analysis and interpretation of mutations in human protein kinases.

Authors:  Jose M G Izarzugaza; Miguel Vazquez; Angela del Pozo; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  FreeContact: fast and free software for protein contact prediction from residue co-evolution.

Authors:  László Kaján; Thomas A Hopf; Matúš Kalaš; Debora S Marks; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Fast and accurate multivariate Gaussian modeling of protein families: predicting residue contacts and protein-interaction partners.

Authors:  Carlo Baldassi; Marco Zamparo; Christoph Feinauer; Andrea Procaccini; Riccardo Zecchina; Martin Weigt; Andrea Pagnani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Integration of QUARK and I-TASSER for Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction in CASP11.

Authors:  Wenxuan Zhang; Jianyi Yang; Baoji He; Sara Elizabeth Walker; Hongjiu Zhang; Brandon Govindarajoo; Jouko Virtanen; Zhidong Xue; Hong-Bin Shen; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Accurate disulfide-bonding network predictions improve ab initio structure prediction of cysteine-rich proteins.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Bao-Ji He; Richard Jang; Yang Zhang; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  ResPRE: high-accuracy protein contact prediction by coupling precision matrix with deep residual neural networks.

Authors:  Yang Li; Jun Hu; Chengxin Zhang; Dong-Jun Yu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Advances in Chromatin and Chromosome Research: Perspectives from Multiple Fields.

Authors:  Andrews Akwasi Agbleke; Assaf Amitai; Jason D Buenrostro; Aditi Chakrabarti; Lingluo Chu; Anders S Hansen; Kristen M Koenig; Ajay S Labade; Sirui Liu; Tadasu Nozaki; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Andrew Seeber; Haitham A Shaban; Jan-Hendrik Spille; Andrew D Stephens; Jun-Han Su; Dushan Wadduwage
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Assessing the accuracy of contact predictions in CASP13.

Authors:  Rojan Shrestha; Eduardo Fajardo; Nelson Gil; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andras Fiser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-24

Review 6.  Deep learning techniques have significantly impacted protein structure prediction and protein design.

Authors:  Robin Pearce; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 7.  An overview of comparative modelling and resources dedicated to large-scale modelling of genome sequences.

Authors:  Su Datt Lam; Sayoni Das; Ian Sillitoe; Christine Orengo
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 7.652

8.  Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age.

Authors:  Joerg Schaarschmidt; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-07

9.  Predicting protein inter-residue contacts using composite likelihood maximization and deep learning.

Authors:  Haicang Zhang; Qi Zhang; Fusong Ju; Jianwei Zhu; Yujuan Gao; Ziwei Xie; Minghua Deng; Shiwei Sun; Wei-Mou Zheng; Dongbo Bu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.