| Literature DB >> 25524177 |
Raphael Itzykson1, Sylvain Thépot2, Céline Berthon3, Jacques Delaunay4, Didier Bouscary5, Thomas Cluzeau6, Pascal Turlure7, Thomas Prébet8, Caroline Dartigeas9, Jean-Pierre Marolleau10, Christian Recher11, Isabelle Plantier12, Aspasia Stamatoullas13, Alain Devidas14, Anne-Laure Taksin15, Romain Guièze16, Denis Caillot17, Norbert Vey8, Lionel Adès1, Norbert Ifrah18, Hervé Dombret1, Pierre Fenaux1, Claude Gardin19.
Abstract
The prognosis of patients older than 50 with relapsed or refractory AML is dismal. Azacitidine has been investigated in older AML patients. Here we report the outcome of 130 patients older than 50 years included in a multicenter patient named program of azacitidine after relapse (n=67) or induction failure (n=63) of intensive chemotherapy. Median age was 67 years, cytogenetic risk was high in 28% and performance status ≥2 in 15% of cases. Most (72%) patients received azacitidine at the standard schedule (75mg/m(2)/d, 7 days/month) for a median of 4 courses. The overall response rate was 17% (CR: 10%, CRi: 7%). Median overall survival was 8.4 months. Achievement of CR/CRi was associated with prolonged survival (P=0.0001), whereas hematological improvement according to MDS criteria, achieved in 36% of patients with resistant disease, did not improve survival. In multivariate analysis, high risk cytogenetics (P=0.022) and peripheral blasts >10% (P<0.0001) at onset of azacitidine were independently predictive of poor prognosis. Combining these two factors, we identified a subgroup of 48% of patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics and peripheral blasts ≤10% and a median OS of 11.3 months. These results warrant further investigation of azacitidine-based regimens in this subgroup of patients.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Azacitidine; Induction failure; Relapse
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25524177 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.11.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156