Literature DB >> 25523852

[Patient-relevant outcomes and surrogates in the early benefit assessment of drugs: first experiences].

Tatjana Kvitkina1, Anette ten Haaf2, Stefanie Reken2, Natalie McGauran2, Beate Wieseler2.   

Abstract

The Act on the Reform of the Market for Medicinal Products (AMNOG) became effective in Germany on January 1, 2011. Since then, the assessment of the added benefit of new drugs versus a therapeutic standard on the basis of dossiers submitted by pharmaceutical companies has been required by law. The Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) generally commissions the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) with this task. The added benefit is primarily to be demonstrated on the basis of patient-relevant outcomes. The aim of this paper is to describe the feasibility of the early benefit assessment on the basis of patient-relevant outcomes by systematically characterising the outcomes available in company dossiers and comparing the companies' and IQWiG's evaluations regarding patient relevance and surrogate validity. Dossier assessments published between October 2011 and June 2012 were used for this purpose. The outcomes available and the respective evaluations were extracted and compared. 12 out of 22 submitted dossiers contained sufficient data to assess outcomes; all 12 assessable dossiers provided data on patient-relevant outcomes. Data on mortality and adverse events were available in all dossiers, except that one dossier did not contain adverse event data on the relevant subpopulation. In contrast, data on morbidity and health-related quality of life were available in 8 and 7 dossiers, respectively. Of a total of 214 outcomes extracted by IQWiG, 124 patient-relevant and 3 surrogate outcomes were included in IQWiG's assessment (companies: a total of 183 outcomes included, of which 172 were patient-relevant and 11 were surrogates). The first experiences with AMNOG have shown that in principle an early benefit assessment of drugs based on patient-relevant outcomes is feasible. The companies' and IQWiG's evaluations regarding patient relevance and surrogate validity of outcomes partly deviated from each other. By increasingly considering patient-relevant outcomes in approval studies, pharmaceutical companies can create the necessary data basis for the early benefit assessment.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMNOG; Early benefit assessment; Frühe Nutzenbewertung; Patientenrelevante Endpunkte; Surrogatendpunkte; patient-relevant outcomes; surrogate outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25523852     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  6 in total

1.  Inconsistent approaches of the G-BA regarding acceptance of primary study endpoints as being relevant to patients - an analysis of three disease areas: oncological, metabolic, and infectious diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Staab; Georg Isbary; Volker E Amelung; Jörg Ruof
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.

Authors:  Christine Kersting; Malte Kneer; Anne Barzel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Patients' perspective on supposedly patient-relevant process and outcome parameters: a cross-sectional survey within the 'PRO patients study'.

Authors:  Christine Kersting; Julia Hülsmann; Klaus Weckbecker; Achim Mortsiefer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Early Benefit Assessments in Oncology in Germany: How Can a Clinically Relevant Endpoint Not Be Relevant to Patients?

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Olivier Flückiger; Niko Andre
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2015-09

5.  Comparison of post-authorisation measures from regulatory authorities with additional evidence requirements from the HTA body in Germany - are additional data requirements by the Federal Joint Committee justified?

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Thomas Staab; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios; Jakob Schröter; Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-09-29

6.  Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib.

Authors:  Vibeke Strand; Jeffrey Kaine; Rieke Alten; Gene Wallenstein; Annette Diehl; Harry Shi; Rebecca Germino; Christopher W Murray
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.156

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.