| Literature DB >> 25523752 |
Michael Melzer1, Jens Ingolf Mönch, Denys Makarov, Yevhen Zabila, Gilbert Santiago Cañón Bermúdez, Daniil Karnaushenko, Stefan Baunack, Falk Bahr, Chenglin Yan, Martin Kaltenbrunner, Oliver G Schmidt.
Abstract
Highly flexible bismuth Hall sensors on polymeric foils are fabricated, and the key optimization steps that are required to boost their sensitivity to the bulk value are identified. The sensor can be bent around the wrist or positioned on the finger to realize an interactive pointing device for wearable electronics. Furthermore, this technology is of great interest for the rapidly developing market of -eMobility, for optimization of eMotors and magnetic bearings.Entities:
Keywords: bismuth Hall sensors; flexible Hall sensorics; flexible electronics; flexible magnetic field sensorics; wearable electronics
Year: 2014 PMID: 25523752 PMCID: PMC4338756 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201405027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Mater ISSN: 0935-9648 Impact factor: 30.849
Figure 1a) Magnified view of the flexible Hall sensor head. The sensor can be mounted on a finger (b) or located at the wrist of a hand (c). d-e) An interactive pointing device is fabricated by applying the flexible sensor to the finger. The relative position of the finger with respect to a permanent magnet is displayed in real time by monitoring the sensor output. f) 1-Dimensional linear array of 8 Hall sensors on an FPC. g) Flexible linear array of sensors connected to the read-out electronics. The sensors are exposed to the field of a permanent magnet, which is swept along the sensor array. h) Time evolution of the response at each of 8 sensors (channels 1 to 8) upon sweeping the magnet from channel 8 to 1 and back. The maximum on the curve corresponds to the arrangement when the magnet is located above the respective sensor in the array.
Figure 2a) Overview SEM image taken at the location of the Hall cross prepared at room temperature on the polyimide foil and subsequently post-annealed at 250 °C for 3 h. Electrical contacts are indicated in the image as well. The sensor element consists of a 230-nm-thick Bi layer. b) Magnified view of panel (a) revealing the morphology of the top surface of the Bi layer. c) SEM image of the top surface of the 280-nm-thick Bi film on flexible PEEK foil. e) Top view of the 140-nm-thick Bi on rigid glass. The panels (b1), (c1), and (e1) show the cross-section images of the respective samples prepared by FIB milling. Panels (d) and (f) reveal cross-section of the samples with 65- and 2000-nm-thick Bi, respectively.
Figure 3Performance of the flexible Hall sensors. a) Hall sensitivity of the 100-nm-thick Bi film grown onto flexible PEEK and polyimide foils measured on the samples prepared at different temperatures. Respective data for the samples prepared on rigid Si wafers is shown for comparison. b) Impact of the Bi film thickness on the Hall sensitivity for the sensors prepared at RT on PEEK foils. The inset shows the change of the Hall voltage with a magnetic flux density of the sensor elements as a function of the Bi film thickness. The measurement was carried out with a supply current of 50 mA. c) Change of the Hall resistance with magnetic flux density measured of the 230-nm-thick Bi film prepared on a polyimide foil. A comparison of the Hall characteristics of the as-prepared and post-annealed samples is shown in the right and left panels, respectively. Post-annealing was performed at 250 °C for 3 h. Right panel shows the Hall resistance of the samples of different thickness. Dashed lines are a guide to the eye. d) Variation of the Hall resistance of flexible sensors upon bending. The sensor consists of a 200-nm-thick Bi film prepared at RT on a polyimide foil and is applied to different sample holders with defined curvatures (inset). The change of the sensitivity of the sensor with bending radii is shown as an inset graph.