Literature DB >> 25523531

Outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era: an analysis from the BCIS database (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society).

Vijay Kunadian1, Weiliang Qiu2, Peter Ludman3, Simon Redwood4, Nick Curzen5, Rodney Stables6, Julian Gunn7, Anthony Gershlick8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine mortality rates among cardiogenic shock (CGS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome in the contemporary treatment era and to determine predictors of mortality.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether recent advances in pharmacological and interventional strategies have resulted in further improvements in short- and long-term mortality and which factors are associated with adverse outcomes in patients presenting with CGS and undergoing PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS: This study analyzed prospectively collected data for patients undergoing PCI in the setting of CGS as recorded in the BCIS (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society) PCI database.
RESULTS: In England and Wales, 6,489 patients underwent PCI for acute coronary syndrome in the setting of CGS. The mortality rates at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year were 37.3%, 40.0%, and 44.3%, respectively. On multiple logistic regression analysis, age (for each 10-year increment of age: odds ratio [OR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51 to 1.68; p < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.70; p < 0.0001), history of renal disease (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.63 to 2.53; p < 0.0001), need for artificial mechanical ventilation (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 2.23 to 2.94; p < 0.0001), intra-aortic balloon pump use (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.40 to 1.76; p < 0.0001), and need for left main stem PCI (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.23; p < 0.0001) were associated with higher mortality at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large U.K. cohort of patients undergoing PCI in the context of CGS, mortality remains high in spite of the use of contemporary PCI strategies. The highest mortality occurs early, and this time period may be a particular target of therapeutic intervention.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiogenic shock; mortality; primary angioplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25523531     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  17 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in acute coronary syndrome patients complicated with cardiogenic shock in Japan: analysis from the Japanese Circulation Society Cardiovascular Shock Registry.

Authors:  Kazuo Sakamoto; Tetsuya Matoba; Masahiro Mohri; Yasushi Ueki; Yasuyuki Tsujita; Masao Yamasaki; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Yohei Hokama; Motoki Fukutomi; Katsutaka Hashiba; Rei Fukuhara; Satoru Suwa; Hirohide Matsuura; Eizo Tachibana; Naohiro Yonemoto; Ken Nagao
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Renal Dysfunction: How to Think About That in Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Luciano Babuin; Daniele Scarpa; Allan S Jaffe
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  [Percutaneous coronary interventions in infarct-related shock and multivessel disease : Only treat the infarct-related vessel or treat all relevant coronary stenoses?]

Authors:  U Janssens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 4.  'Combat' Approach to Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Alexander G Truesdell; Behnam Tehrani; Ramesh Singh; Shashank Desai; Patricia Saulino; Scott Barnett; Stephen Lavanier; Charles Murphy
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

5.  Outcomes in Women and Minorities Compared With White Men 1 Year After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Insights and Results From the PLATINUM Diversity and PROMUS Element Plus Post-Approval Study Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Wayne Batchelor; David E Kandzari; Scott Davis; Luis Tami; John C Wang; Islam Othman; Osvaldo S Gigliotti; Amir Haghighat; Sarabjeet Singh; Mario Lopez; Gregory Giugliano; Phillip A Horwitz; Jaya Chandrasekhar; Paul Underwood; Craig A Thompson; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Culprit vessel-related myocardial mechanics and prognostic implications following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sören J Backhaus; Johannes T Kowallick; Thomas Stiermaier; Torben Lange; Alexander Koschalka; Jenny-Lou Navarra; Joachim Lotz; Shelby Kutty; Boris Bigalke; Matthias Gutberlet; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Gerd Hasenfuß; Holger Thiele; Andreas Schuster; Ingo Eitel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Nathan Spence; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

8.  Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.

Authors:  Georg Fuernau; Karl Fengler; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Antoinette de Waha; Suzanne de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Rainer Hambrecht; Christian Jung; Michael Böhm; Janine Pöss; Ruth H Strasser; Steffen Schneider; Taoufik Ouarrak; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Percutaneous assist devices in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: Review, meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Romeo; Maria Cristina Acconcia; Domenico Sergi; Alessia Romeo; Simona Francioni; Flavia Chiarotti; Quintilio Caretta
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

Review 10.  Contemporary device management of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tariq Suleiman; Alexander Scott; David Tong; Vikram Khanna; Vijay Kunadian
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.