Literature DB >> 25523174

The effect of flowering time and distance between pollen source and recipient on maize.

Shuo-Cheng Nieh1, Wen-Shin Lin, Yung-Heng Hsu, Guang-Jauh Shieh, Bo-Jein Kuo.   

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Central Taiwan for 2 crop seasons to examine the effect of non-coincidence flowering on the cross-pollination (CP) rate of maize at various distances. Four local maize hybrid varieties with different flowering dates and one local maize variety were sown as the pollen sources and recipient, respectively. All varieties were sown on the same day to simulate the real situation of coexistence in which adjacent fields are sown with different genetically modified (GM) and non-GM varieties of maize. The CP rate was <0.2% at a distance of 3 m for the first crop season when the flowering time for the recipient was 5 d later than that of the pollen source variety. The CP rate was <0.02% at all distances for the second season when the flowering time for the recipient was 7 d later than that of the pollen source variety. The CP rate was <1% at a distance of 0.75 m when the flowering time was 3 d later. However, varieties with closer synchrony may result in a CP rate of >1% at a distance of 1.5 m and <1% at 2.25 m. Temporal separation and isolation distances can work together in Taiwan with fragmented landscapes to minimize the adventitious presence of one crop with another.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVK, the average total kernel number per ear in the whole field; CP, cross-pollination; GM, genetically modified; cross-pollination; flowering time; maize; temporal separation; xenia effect

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25523174      PMCID: PMC5033231          DOI: 10.4161/21645698.2014.947805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  2 in total

1.  Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize in real situations of coexistence.

Authors:  Joaquima Messeguer; Gisela Peñas; Jordi Ballester; Marta Bas; Joan Serra; Jordi Salvia; Montserrat Palaudelmàs; Enric Melé
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.803

2.  Spatially explicit modelling of transgenic maize pollen dispersal and cross-pollination.

Authors:  Christine Loos; Ralf Seppelt; Sara Meier-Bethke; Joachim Schiemann; Otto Richter
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 2.691

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  Using a zero-inflated model to assess gene flow risk and coexistence of Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L. on a field scale in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yuan-Chih Su; Po-Shung Wang; Jhih-Ling Yang; Hong Hong; Tzu-Kai Lin; Yuan-Kai Tu; Bo-Jein Kuo
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.787

2.  Effectiveness of different sampling schemes in predicting adventitious genetically modified maize content in a smallholder farming system.

Authors:  Yun-Syuan Jhong; Wen-Shin Lin; Tien-Joung Yiu; Yuan-Chih Su; Bo-Jein Kuo
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Incorporating the field border effect to reduce the predicted uncertainty of pollen dispersal model in Asia.

Authors:  Yuan-Chih Su; Cheng-Bin Lee; Tien-Joung Yiu; Bo-Jein Kuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Application of the maximum threshold distances to reduce gene flow frequency in the coexistence between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM maize.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Ji-Chao Hu; Xiao-Dong Jiang; Wei Xiao; Ke-Min Yao; Liang Li; Xin-Hai Li; Xin-Wu Pei
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Assessing the Likelihood of Gene Flow From Sugarcane (Saccharum Hybrids) to Wild Relatives in South Africa.

Authors:  Sandy J Snyman; Dennis M Komape; Hlobisile Khanyi; Johnnie van den Berg; Dirk Cilliers; Dyfed Lloyd Evans; Sandra Barnard; Stefan J Siebert
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.