Literature DB >> 25523008

Intracortical modulation, and not spinal inhibition, mediates placebo analgesia.

M Martini1, M C H Lee, E Valentini, G D Iannetti.   

Abstract

Suppression of spinal responses to noxious stimulation has been detected using spinal fMRI during placebo analgesia, which is therefore increasingly considered a phenomenon caused by descending inhibition of spinal activity. However, spinal fMRI is technically challenging and prone to false-positive results. Here we recorded laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) during placebo analgesia in humans. LEPs allow neural activity to be measured directly and with high enough temporal resolution to capture the sequence of cortical areas activated by nociceptive stimuli. If placebo analgesia is mediated by inhibition at spinal level, this would result in a general suppression of LEPs rather than in a selective reduction of their late components. LEPs and subjective pain ratings were obtained in two groups of healthy volunteers - one was conditioned for placebo analgesia while the other served as unconditioned control. Laser stimuli at three suprathreshold energies were delivered to the right hand dorsum. Placebo analgesia was associated with a significant reduction of the amplitude of the late P2 component. In contrast, the early N1 component, reflecting the arrival of the nociceptive input to the primary somatosensory cortex (SI), was only affected by stimulus energy. This selective suppression of late LEPs indicates that placebo analgesia is mediated by direct intracortical modulation rather than inhibition of the nociceptive input at spinal level. The observed cortical modulation occurs after the responses elicited by the nociceptive stimulus in the SI, suggesting that higher order sensory processes are modulated during placebo analgesia.
© 2014 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  descending inhibition; intra-cortical modulation; laser-evoked potentials; pain; placebo analgesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25523008     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  7 in total

Review 1.  The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Placebo Effects on the Neurologic Pain Signature: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Ulrike Bingel; Tor D Wager
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  Beyond conformity: Social influences on pain reports and physiology.

Authors:  Leonie Koban; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-08-31

Review 4.  What do monoamines do in pain modulation?

Authors:  Kirsty Bannister; Anthony H Dickenson
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.302

5.  Negative expectations interfere with the analgesic effect of safety cues on pain perception by priming the cortical representation of pain in the midcingulate cortex.

Authors:  Abeer F Almarzouki; Christopher A Brown; Richard J Brown; Matthew H K Leung; Anthony K P Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Thermal grill conditioning: Effect on contact heat evoked potentials.

Authors:  Catherine R Jutzeler; Freda M Warner; Johann Wanek; Armin Curt; John L K Kramer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Brain potentials evoked by intraepidermal electrical stimuli reflect the central sensitization of nociceptive pathways.

Authors:  M Liang; M C Lee; J O'Neill; A H Dickenson; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.