Literature DB >> 25522769

Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of the Interdisciplinary Management Tool: a reflective tool to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork using Structured, Facilitated Action Research for Implementation.

Susan A Nancarrow1, Tony Smith2, Steven Ariss3, Pamela M Enderby3.   

Abstract

Reflective practice is used increasingly to enhance team functioning and service effectiveness; however, there is little evidence of its use in interdisciplinary teams. This paper presents the qualitative evaluation of the Interdisciplinary Management Tool (IMT), an evidence-based change tool designed to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork through structured team reflection. The IMT incorporates three components: an evidence-based resource guide; a reflective implementation framework based on Structured, Facilitated Action Research for Implementation methodology; and formative and summative evaluation components. The IMT was implemented with intermediate care teams supported by independent facilitators in England. Each intervention lasted 6 months and was evaluated over a 12-month period. Data sources include interviews, a focus group with facilitators, questionnaires completed by team members and documentary feedback from structured team reports. Data were analysed qualitatively using the Framework approach. The IMT was implemented with 10 teams, including 253 staff from more than 10 different disciplines. Team challenges included lack of clear vision; communication issues; limited career progression opportunities; inefficient resource use; need for role clarity and service development. The IMT successfully engaged staff in the change process, and resulted in teams developing creative strategies to address the issues identified. Participants valued dedicated time to focus on the processes of team functioning; however, some were uncomfortable with a focus on teamwork at the expense of delivering direct patient care. The IMT is a relatively low-cost, structured, reflective way to enhance team function. It empowers individuals to understand and value their own, and others' roles and responsibilities within the team; identify barriers to effective teamwork, and develop and implement appropriate solutions to these. To be successful, teams need protected time to take for reflection, and executive support to be able to broker changes that are beyond the scope of the team.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action research; interdisciplinary; intermediate care; interprofessional; reflective teamwork; transition care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25522769     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  4 in total

1.  Participation in interdisciplinary meetings on genetic diagnostics (NGS).

Authors:  Tom Koole; Lotte van Burgsteden; Paulien Harms; Cleo C van Diemen; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  A systematic review of team-building interventions in non-acute healthcare settings.

Authors:  Christopher J Miller; Bo Kim; Allie Silverman; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Integrating Diverse Disciplines to Enhance Interprofessional Competency in Healthcare Delivery.

Authors:  Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer; Lee Revere; Mariya Tankimovich; Erica Yu; Robert Spears; Jennifer Lee Swails
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10

4.  Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade.

Authors:  Martina Buljac-Samardzic; Kirti D Doekhie; Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-01-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.