Richard L Haspel1, Yulia Lin2, Ranjeeta Mallick3, Alan Tinmouth4, Joan Cid5, Hermann Eichler6, Miguel Lozano5, Leo van de Watering7, Patrick B Fisher8, Asma Ali8, Eric Parks8. 1. Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Clinical Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, University Clinic Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. 6. Institute of Clinical Hemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 7. Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin/LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands. 8. American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is the most common hospital procedure performed in the United States. While inadequate physician transfusion medicine knowledge may lead to inappropriate practice, such an educational deficit has not been investigated on an international scale using a validated assessment tool. Identifying specific deficiencies is critical for developing curricula to improve patient care. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Rasch analysis, a method used in high-stakes testing, was used to validate an assessment tool consisting of a 23-question survey and a 20-question examination. The assessment tool was administered to internal medicine residents to determine prior training, attitudes, perceived ability, and actual knowledge related to transfusion medicine. RESULTS: A total of 474 residents at 23 programs in nine countries completed the examination. The overall mean score of correct responses was 45.7% (site range, 32%-56%). The mean score for Postgraduate Year (PGY)1 (43.9%) was significantly lower than for PGY3 (47.1%) and PGY4 (50.6%) residents. Although 89% of residents had participated in obtaining informed consent from a patient for transfusion, residents scored poorly (<25% correct) on questions related to transfusion reactions. The majority of residents (65%) would find additional transfusion medicine training "very" or "extremely" helpful. CONCLUSION: Internationally, internal medicine residents have poor transfusion medicine knowledge and would welcome additional training. The especially limited knowledge of transfusion reactions suggests an initial area for focused training. This study not only represents the largest international assessment of transfusion medicine knowledge, but also serves as a model for rigorous, collaborative research in medical education.
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is the most common hospital procedure performed in the United States. While inadequate physician transfusion medicine knowledge may lead to inappropriate practice, such an educational deficit has not been investigated on an international scale using a validated assessment tool. Identifying specific deficiencies is critical for developing curricula to improve patient care. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Rasch analysis, a method used in high-stakes testing, was used to validate an assessment tool consisting of a 23-question survey and a 20-question examination. The assessment tool was administered to internal medicine residents to determine prior training, attitudes, perceived ability, and actual knowledge related to transfusion medicine. RESULTS: A total of 474 residents at 23 programs in nine countries completed the examination. The overall mean score of correct responses was 45.7% (site range, 32%-56%). The mean score for Postgraduate Year (PGY)1 (43.9%) was significantly lower than for PGY3 (47.1%) and PGY4 (50.6%) residents. Although 89% of residents had participated in obtaining informed consent from a patient for transfusion, residents scored poorly (<25% correct) on questions related to transfusion reactions. The majority of residents (65%) would find additional transfusion medicine training "very" or "extremely" helpful. CONCLUSION: Internationally, internal medicine residents have poor transfusion medicine knowledge and would welcome additional training. The especially limited knowledge of transfusion reactions suggests an initial area for focused training. This study not only represents the largest international assessment of transfusion medicine knowledge, but also serves as a model for rigorous, collaborative research in medical education.
Authors: Candace C Fuller; Vinod E Nambudiri; Caren Spencer-Smith; Lesley H Curtis; Mayura Shinde; Austin Cosgrove; Margaret Johnson; Jason Hickok; Stacey Honda; Heba Ismail; Richard Max Kaufman; Adee Kennedy; Karla M Miller; David J Mohlman; Russell E Poland; Robert Rosofsky; Kimberly Smith; Salim R Surani; Meghan A Baker Journal: Transfusion Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Carlos João Schaffhausser Filho; João Carlos Pina Faria; Fabíola Isabel Suano-Souza; Roseli Oselka Saccardo Sarni Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2020-09-14
Authors: Henry Ddungu; Elizabeth M Krantz; Warren Phipps; Sandra Naluzze; Jackson Orem; Noah Kiwanuka; Anna Wald; Isaac Kajja Journal: J Glob Oncol Date: 2018-10