Literature DB >> 25522192

Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking.

Matthias J Sjerps1, Antje S Meyer2.   

Abstract

The smooth transitions between turns in natural conversation suggest that speakers often begin to plan their utterances while listening to their interlocutor. The presented study investigates whether this is indeed the case and, if so, when utterance planning begins. Two hypotheses were contrasted: that speakers begin to plan their turn as soon as possible (in our experiments less than a second after the onset of the interlocutor's turn), or that they do so close to the end of the interlocutor's turn. Turn-taking was combined with a finger tapping task to measure variations in cognitive load. We assumed that the onset of speech planning in addition to listening would be accompanied by deterioration in tapping performance. Two picture description experiments were conducted. In both experiments there were three conditions: (1) Tapping and Speaking, where participants tapped a complex pattern while taking over turns from a pre-recorded speaker, (2) Tapping and Listening, where participants carried out the tapping task while overhearing two pre-recorded speakers, and (3) Speaking Only, where participants took over turns as in the Tapping and Speaking condition but without tapping. The experiments differed in the amount of tapping training the participants received at the beginning of the session. In Experiment 2, the participants' eye-movements were recorded in addition to their speech and tapping. Analyses of the participants' tapping performance and eye movements showed that they initiated the cognitively demanding aspects of speech planning only shortly before the end of the turn of the preceding speaker. We argue that this is a smart planning strategy, which may be the speakers' default in many everyday situations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-task; Eye-tracking; Speech perception; Speech production; Turn-taking

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25522192     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  12 in total

1.  The use of content and timing to predict turn transitions.

Authors:  Simon Garrod; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

2.  Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language.

Authors:  Stephen C Levinson; Francisco Torreira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-12

3.  Prediction and Production of Simple Mathematical Equations: Evidence from Visual World Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Florian Hintz; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The intersection of turn-taking and repair: the timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation.

Authors:  Kobin H Kendrick
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-12

5.  The Timing of Utterance Planning in Task-Oriented Dialogue: Evidence from a Novel List-Completion Paradigm.

Authors:  Mathias Barthel; Sebastian Sauppe; Stephen C Levinson; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Next Speakers Plan Their Turn Early and Speak after Turn-Final "Go-Signals".

Authors:  Mathias Barthel; Antje S Meyer; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-11

7.  Temporal Preparation for Speaking in Question-Answer Sequences.

Authors:  Lilla Magyari; Jan P De Ruiter; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Working Together: Contributions of Corpus Analyses and Experimental Psycholinguistics to Understanding Conversation.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Phillip M Alday; Caitlin Decuyper; Birgit Knudsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-12

9.  Interference in speaking while hearing and vice versa.

Authors:  Raphaël Fargier; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation.

Authors:  Sara Bögels; Lilla Magyari; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.