Literature DB >> 25522136

Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and conventional dressing methods for fibula free flap donor site management in patients with head and neck cancer.

Christine A Bach1,2, Lia Guilleré1,2, Sinasi Yildiz1, Isabelle Wagner1, Serge Darmon3, Frédéric Chabolle1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in fibula free flap donor site management in head and neck cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study from 2007 to 2013 comparing fibula free flap donor site healing time after conventional bolster dressing or negative pressure wound therapy.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated by conventional dressing and 16 patients were treated by negative pressure wound therapy. The mean graft loss rate was higher in the bolster group (37%) than in the negative pressure wound therapy group (19%). The mean total healing time was significantly shorter in the negative pressure wound therapy group than in the bolster group (67 days vs 163 days; p = .02).
CONCLUSION: The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fibula free flap donor site management facilitates early patient mobilization, ensures better graft acceptance, and significantly decreases the healing time.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fibula free flap donor site head and neck cancer; negative pressure wound therapy; split-thickness skin graft dressing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25522136     DOI: 10.1002/hed.23952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  5 in total

1.  Comparison between primary closure and skin grafts of the free fibula osteocutaneous flap donor site.

Authors:  Masaya Akashi; Kazunobu Hashikawa; Hiroyuki Takasu; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Junya Kusumoto; Akiko Sakakibara; Takumi Hasegawa; Tsutomu Minamikawa; Takahide Komori
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-23

2.  Association of Bolster Duration With Uptake Rates of Fibula Donor Site Skin Grafts.

Authors:  Abel P David; Chase Heaton; Andrea Park; Rahul Seth; P Daniel Knott; Jeffrey D Markey
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options.

Authors:  Marie Kearns; Panagiotis Ermogenous; Simon Myers; Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-11-15

4.  Impact of Periosteal Branches and Septo-Cutaneous Perforators on Free Fibula Flap Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis of Computed Tomography Angiography Scans in Virtual Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Michael Knitschke; Anna Katrin Baumgart; Christina Bäcker; Christian Adelung; Fritz Roller; Daniel Schmermund; Sebastian Böttger; Philipp Streckbein; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Sameh Attia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Miniature Negative Pressure Dressings on Forearm Donor Sites after Radial Forearm Flap Harvest.

Authors:  Edward Ray; Stuart L Mitchell; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.