María Clara Restrepo-Méndez1, Aluísio J D Barros1, Robert E Black2, Cesar G Victora1. 1. 1International Center for Equity in Health,Federal University of Pelotas,Rua Marechal Deodoro 1160,3° Piso,96020-220 Pelotas,Brazil. 2. 2Institute for International Programs,Bloomberg School of Public Health,Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore,MD,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Much is known about national trends in child undernutrition, but there is little information on how socio-economic inequalities are evolving over time. We aimed to assess socio-economic inequalities in stunting prevalence over time. DESIGN: We selected nationally representative surveys carried out since the mid-1990s for which information was available on asset indices and on child anthropometry. We identified twenty-five countries that had at least two surveys over an interval of 10 years or more, totalling eighty-seven surveys. Stunting prevalence was calculated according to wealth quintiles. Absolute and relative inequalities were calculated and time trends were obtained by regression. Setting Nationally representative household surveys from twenty-five low- and middle-income countries. SUBJECTS: Children <5 years of age. RESULTS: National prevalence declined significantly in twenty-two of the twenty-five countries. In eighteen out of twenty-five countries, relative reductions were higher among the rich than among the poor. Overall, there was no indication that inequalities improved. Striking examples are Nepal, with a 17·0 percentage points decline in stunting per decade, but where inequalities increased sharply; and Brazil, where stunting fell by 6·7 percentage points and inequalities were all but eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Global progress in reducing stunting has not been accompanied by improved equity, but countries varied markedly in how successful they were in reducing prevalence among the poorest children. It is important to document how some countries were able to reduce inequalities, so that these lessons can be used to foster global progress, particularly in light of the increased importance of within-country inequalities in the post-2015 agenda.
OBJECTIVE: Much is known about national trends in child undernutrition, but there is little information on how socio-economic inequalities are evolving over time. We aimed to assess socio-economic inequalities in stunting prevalence over time. DESIGN: We selected nationally representative surveys carried out since the mid-1990s for which information was available on asset indices and on child anthropometry. We identified twenty-five countries that had at least two surveys over an interval of 10 years or more, totalling eighty-seven surveys. Stunting prevalence was calculated according to wealth quintiles. Absolute and relative inequalities were calculated and time trends were obtained by regression. Setting Nationally representative household surveys from twenty-five low- and middle-income countries. SUBJECTS:Children <5 years of age. RESULTS: National prevalence declined significantly in twenty-two of the twenty-five countries. In eighteen out of twenty-five countries, relative reductions were higher among the rich than among the poor. Overall, there was no indication that inequalities improved. Striking examples are Nepal, with a 17·0 percentage points decline in stunting per decade, but where inequalities increased sharply; and Brazil, where stunting fell by 6·7 percentage points and inequalities were all but eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Global progress in reducing stunting has not been accompanied by improved equity, but countries varied markedly in how successful they were in reducing prevalence among the poorest children. It is important to document how some countries were able to reduce inequalities, so that these lessons can be used to foster global progress, particularly in light of the increased importance of within-country inequalities in the post-2015 agenda.
Authors: Aluísio J D Barros; Carine Ronsmans; Henrik Axelson; Edilberto Loaiza; Andréa D Bertoldi; Giovanny V A França; Jennifer Bryce; J Ties Boerma; Cesar G Victora Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-03-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Carlos Augusto Monteiro; Maria Helena D'Aquino Benicio; Wolney Lisboa Conde; Silvia Konno; Ana Lucia Lovadino; Aluisio J D Barros; Cesar Gomes Victora Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Cesar G Victora; Estela M L Aquino; Maria do Carmo Leal; Carlos Augusto Monteiro; Fernando C Barros; Celia L Szwarcwald Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert E Black; Cesar G Victora; Susan P Walker; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Parul Christian; Mercedes de Onis; Majid Ezzati; Sally Grantham-McGregor; Joanne Katz; Reynaldo Martorell; Ricardo Uauy Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer Bryce; Kate Gilroy; Gareth Jones; Elizabeth Hazel; Robert E Black; Cesar G Victora Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gretchen A Stevens; Mariel M Finucane; Christopher J Paciorek; Seth R Flaxman; Richard A White; Abigail J Donner; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kuda Mutasa; Robert Ntozini; Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Sandra Rukobo; Margaret Govha; Florence D Majo; Naume Tavengwa; Laura E Smith; Laura Caulfield; Jonathan R Swann; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; Lawrence H Moulton; Jean H Humphrey; Ethan K Gough; Andrew J Prendergast Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jamie L Dorsey; Swetha Manohar; Sumanta Neupane; Binod Shrestha; Rolf D W Klemm; Keith P West Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: María Clara Restrepo-Méndez; Aluísio Jd Barros; Robert E Black; Cesar G Victora Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.539