Literature DB >> 25521224

A6V polymorphism of the human μ-opioid receptor decreases signalling of morphine and endogenous opioids in vitro.

Alisa Knapman1, Marina Santiago, Mark Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Polymorphisms of the μ opioid receptor (MOPr) may contribute to the variation in responses to opioid drugs in clinical and unregulated situations. The A6V variant of MOPr (MOPr-A6V) is present in up to 20% of individuals in some populations, and may be associated with heightened susceptibility to drug abuse. There are no functional studies examining the acute signalling of MOPr-A6V in vitro, so we investigated potential functional differences between MOPr and MOPr-A6V at several signalling pathways using structurally distinct opioid ligands. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: CHO and AtT-20 cells stably expressing MOPr and MOPr-A6V were used. AC inhibition and ERK1/2 phosphorylation were assayed in CHO cells; K channel activation was assayed in AtT-20 cells. KEY
RESULTS: Buprenorphine did not inhibit AC or stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing MOPr-A6V, but buprenorphine activation of K channels in AtT-20 cells was preserved. [D-Ala2, N-MePhe4, Gly-ol]-enkephalin, morphine and β-endorphin inhibition of AC was significantly reduced via MOPr-A6V, as was signalling of all opioids to ERK1/2. However, there was little effect of the A6V variant on K channel activation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Signalling to AC and ERK via the mutant MOPr-A6V was decreased for many opioids, including the clinically significant drugs morphine, buprenorphine and fentanyl, as well endogenous opioids. The MOPr-A6V variant is common and this compromised signalling may affect individual responses to opioid therapy, while the possible disruption of the endogenous opioid system may contribute to susceptibility to substance abuse.
© 2014 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25521224      PMCID: PMC4403092          DOI: 10.1111/bph.13047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  55 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms and regulation of opioid receptor signaling.

Authors:  P Y Law; Y H Wong; H H Loh
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  Sequence variability and candidate gene analysis in complex disease: association of mu opioid receptor gene variation with substance dependence.

Authors:  M R Hoehe; K Köpke; B Wendel; K Rohde; C Flachmeier; K K Kidd; W H Berrettini; G M Church
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-11-22       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Mu opioid receptor gene polymorphisms and heroin dependence in Asian populations.

Authors:  Ene-Choo Tan; Chay-Hoon Tan; Umavathy Karupathivan; Eric P H Yap
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  A genetic association study of the mu opioid receptor and severe opioid dependence.

Authors:  James J Crowley; David W Oslin; Ashwin A Patkar; Edward Gottheil; Peter A DeMaria; Charles P O'Brien; Wade H Berrettini; Dorothy E Grice
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.458

Review 5.  Mu-opioid receptor desensitization: is morphine different?

Authors:  Mark Connor; Peregrine B Osborne; MacDonald J Christie
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Genetic analysis of the mu-opioid receptor in alcohol-dependent individuals.

Authors:  H Rommelspacher; M Smolka; L G Schmidt; J Samochowiec; M R Hoehe
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Opioid agonists have different efficacy profiles for G protein activation, rapid desensitization, and endocytosis of mu-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Stephanie L Borgland; Mark Connor; Peregrine B Osborne; John B Furness; MacDonald J Christie
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Constitutive activity of the melanocortin-4 receptor is maintained by its N-terminal domain and plays a role in energy homeostasis in humans.

Authors:  Supriya Srinivasan; Cecile Lubrano-Berthelier; Cedric Govaerts; Franck Picard; Pamela Santiago; Bruce R Conklin; Christian Vaisse
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Association between human mu-opioid receptor gene polymorphism, pain tolerance, and opioid addiction.

Authors:  Peggy Compton; Daniel H Geschwind; Maricela Alarcón
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.568

10.  Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations.

Authors:  G W Hanks; F Conno; N Cherny; M Hanna; E Kalso; H J McQuay; S Mercadante; J Meynadier; P Poulain; C Ripamonti; L Radbruch; J R Casas; J Sawe; R G Twycross; V Ventafridda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Convergent Balancing Selection on the Mu-Opioid Receptor in Primates.

Authors:  Carolyn G Sweeney; Juliette M Rando; Helen N Panas; Gregory M Miller; Donna M Platt; Eric J Vallender
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Drug Binding Poses Relate Structure with Efficacy in the μ Opioid Receptor.

Authors:  Katy J Sutcliffe; Graeme Henderson; Eamonn Kelly; Richard B Sessions
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Tapentadol shows lower intrinsic efficacy at µ receptor than morphine and oxycodone.

Authors:  Preeti Manandhar; Mark Connor; Marina Santiago
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2022-02

4.  The E2.65A mutation disrupts dynamic binding poses of SB269652 at the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar Verma; Ara M Abramyan; Mayako Michino; R Benjamin Free; David R Sibley; Jonathan A Javitch; J Robert Lane; Lei Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.