BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane has been associated not only with improved cancer patient survival but also with secondary malignancies and reduced tumour response. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We investigated the DNA damage response and the role of the activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) accumulation in tumour cells exposed to dexrazoxane. KEY RESULTS: Dexrazoxane exposure induced topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A)-dependent cell death, γ-H2AX accumulation and increased tail moment in neutral comet assays. Dexrazoxane induced DNA damage responses, shown by enhanced levels of γ-H2AX/53BP1 foci, ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated), ATR (ATM and Rad3-related), Chk1 and Chk2 phosphorylation, and by p53 accumulation. Dexrazoxane-induced γ-H2AX accumulation was dependent on ATM. ATF3 protein was induced by dexrazoxane in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, which was abolished in TOP2A-depleted cells and in cells pre-incubated with ATM inhibitor. Knockdown of ATF3 gene expression by siRNA triggered apoptosis in control cells and diminished the p53 protein level in both control and dexrazoxane -treated cells. This was accompanied by increased γ-H2AX accumulation. ATF3 knockdown also delayed the repair of dexrazoxane -induced DNA double-strand breaks. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As with other TOP2A poisons, dexrazoxane induced DNA double-strand breaks followed by activation of the DNA damage response. The DNA damage-triggered ATF3 controlled p53 accumulation and generation of double-strand breaks and is proposed to serve as a switch between DNA damage and cell death following dexrazoxane treatment. These findings suggest a mechanistic explanation for the diverse clinical observations associated with dexrazoxane.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane has been associated not only with improved cancerpatient survival but also with secondary malignancies and reduced tumour response. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We investigated the DNA damage response and the role of the activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) accumulation in tumour cells exposed to dexrazoxane. KEY RESULTS:Dexrazoxane exposure induced topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A)-dependent cell death, γ-H2AX accumulation and increased tail moment in neutral comet assays. Dexrazoxane induced DNA damage responses, shown by enhanced levels of γ-H2AX/53BP1 foci, ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated), ATR (ATM and Rad3-related), Chk1 and Chk2 phosphorylation, and by p53 accumulation. Dexrazoxane-induced γ-H2AX accumulation was dependent on ATM. ATF3 protein was induced by dexrazoxane in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, which was abolished in TOP2A-depleted cells and in cells pre-incubated with ATM inhibitor. Knockdown of ATF3 gene expression by siRNA triggered apoptosis in control cells and diminished the p53 protein level in both control and dexrazoxane -treated cells. This was accompanied by increased γ-H2AX accumulation. ATF3 knockdown also delayed the repair of dexrazoxane -induced DNA double-strand breaks. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As with other TOP2A poisons, dexrazoxane induced DNA double-strand breaks followed by activation of the DNA damage response. The DNA damage-triggered ATF3 controlled p53 accumulation and generation of double-strand breaks and is proposed to serve as a switch between DNA damage and cell death following dexrazoxane treatment. These findings suggest a mechanistic explanation for the diverse clinical observations associated with dexrazoxane.
Authors: L H Jensen; K C Nitiss; A Rose; J Dong; J Zhou; T Hu; N Osheroff; P B Jensen; M Sehested; J L Nitiss Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-01-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: B L Bennett; D T Sasaki; B W Murray; E C O'Leary; S T Sakata; W Xu; J C Leisten; A Motiwala; S Pierce; Y Satoh; S S Bhagwat; A M Manning; D W Anderson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-11-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: K C Huang; H Gao; E F Yamasaki; D R Grabowski; S Liu; L L Shen; K K Chan; R Ganapathi; R M Snapka Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2001-09-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: I Wessel; L H Jensen; P B Jensen; J Falck; A Rose; M Roerth; J L Nitiss; M Sehested Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jaap Kool; Mohamed Hamdi; Paulien Cornelissen-Steijger; Alex J van der Eb; Carrol Terleth; Hans van Dam Journal: Oncogene Date: 2003-07-03 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Paul W Burridge; Yong Fuga Li; Elena Matsa; Haodi Wu; Sang-Ging Ong; Arun Sharma; Alexandra Holmström; Alex C Chang; Michael J Coronado; Antje D Ebert; Joshua W Knowles; Melinda L Telli; Ronald M Witteles; Helen M Blau; Daniel Bernstein; Russ B Altman; Joseph C Wu Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Brian A Van Tine; Angela C Hirbe; Peter Oppelt; Ashley E Frith; Richa Rathore; Joshua D Mitchell; Fei Wan; Shellie Berry; Michele Landeau; George A Heberton; John Gorcsan; Peter R Huntjens; Yoku Soyama; Justin M Vader; Jose A Alvarez-Cardona; Kathleen W Zhang; Daniel J Lenihan; Ronald J Krone Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robin L Jones; Andrew J Wagner; Akira Kawai; Kazuo Tamura; Ashwin Shahir; Brian A Van Tine; Javier Martín-Broto; Patrick M Peterson; Jennifer Wright; William D Tap Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: KirkE Hevener; Tatsiana A Verstak; Katie E Lutat; Daniel L Riggsbee; Jeremiah W Mooney Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 11.413
Authors: Mohamed S Hasim; Carolyn Nessim; Patrick J Villeneuve; Barbara C Vanderhyden; Jim Dimitroulakos Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 4.243