Literature DB >> 25521008

Sequential healing at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs.

Tomaso Mainetti1, Niklaus P Lang2,3, Franco Bengazi1, Vittorio Favero1, Luis Soto Cantero1, Daniele Botticelli1,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sequential healing at implants installed in a healed alveolar bony ridge or immediately after tooth extraction without functional load.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the mandible of 12 dogs, the mesial roots of the first molars were endodontically treated, the tooth hemisected, and the distal roots extracted. After 3 months, the mesial roots of the fourth premolars were endodontically treated, the tooth hemisected, and the distal roots extracted in one side of the mandible. Implants were placed immediately into extraction sockets (IPIES) of the fourth premolar and in the healed sites in the molar regions. Healing abutments were placed, and the flaps were sutured to allow a non-submerged healing. The time of surgery and of sacrifices were planned in such a way to obtain biopsies representing the healing after 1 and 2 weeks and 1 and 3 months, respectively. Ground sections were prepared for histological evaluation of tissues components on the implant surface and the coronal termination level of osseointegration (M-B).
RESULTS: New bone apposition on the implant surface was slightly higher at the healed compared to the IPIES sites, being 7.4% and 4.1% after 1 week, and 67.3% and 65.3% after 3 months, respectively. Old bone was progressively resorbed, from 27.0% and 21.9% after 1 week, to 2.5% and 2.0% after 3 months, at healed and IPIES sites, respectively. M-B was 1.4 mm and 2.6 mm after 1 week, 1.2 mm and 1.2 mm after 3 months, at healed and IPIES sites, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar patterns of sequential osseointegration were found at implants installed in healed alveolar bone or in alveolar sockets immediately after tooth extraction. The coronal termination level of osseointegration, that was different after 1 week, was found similar at the 3-month observation.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal study; extraction sockets; histology; implants placed immediately into extraction sockets; sequential healing; wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25521008     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  2 in total

1.  Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?

Authors:  Gang Yue; Husham Edani; Andrew Sullivan; Shuying Jiang; Hamed Kazerani; Mohammad Ali Saghiri
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-02-26

2.  Bone healing at non-submerged implants installed with different insertion torques: a split-mouth histomorphometric randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Amari; Adriano Piattelli; Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman; Natalia Fortich Mesa; Mauro Ferri; Giovanna Iezzi; Daniele Botticelli
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-12-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.