Literature DB >> 25520902

Why They Stay: Understanding Research Participant Retention in Studies of Aging, Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.

Judith Neugroschl1, Mary Sano2, Xiaodong Luo1, Margaret Sewell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retaining participants in longitudinal research in aging and Alzheimer's disease remains a significant challenge. "Study partners" are often required to insure participation and accuracy of information because cognitive impairment may interfere with accurate reporting. The purpose of the present report was to identify attitudes and reasons for continued participation in observational research.
METHODS: 53 individuals (33 participants and 20 study partners) who were participating in the longitudinal cohort at the Mount Sinai Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were available for this survey. They were asked a single open-ended question about why they continued in our study. Seven categories of answers (e.g., Altruism, Value relationship with staff, and Concern about health) were identified and frequency of endorsement was summarized for participants and study partners separately.
RESULTS: There were 82 responses from the 53 individuals. Forty five percent of the participants and 55% of the study partners identified altruism as one reason they participate in research over time, and 75% of study partners and 30% of participants mentioned valuing the relationship with staff as a reason they stayed in research.
CONCLUSIONS: This data suggests that retention efforts should be directed toward fostering strong relationships between research staff and study participants and reinforcing the opportunity to contribute to others, which fosters a sense of altruism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive Impairment; Dementia; Participant Retention

Year:  2014        PMID: 25520902      PMCID: PMC4266483          DOI: 10.4172/2167-7182.1000170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol Geriatr Res        ISSN: 2167-7182


  6 in total

1.  Age-related differences in altruism across adulthood: making personal financial gain versus contributing to the public good.

Authors:  Alexandra M Freund; Fredda Blanchard-Fields
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-09-23

2.  Challenges and implications for biomedical research and intervention studies in older populations: insights from the ELDERMET study.

Authors:  Siobhán Cusack; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 3.  Maintaining adherence and retention in dementia prevention trials.

Authors:  Steven T DeKosky
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Understanding why older people participate in clinical trials: the experience of the Scottish PROSPER participants.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Tolmie; Moira M B Mungall; Greig Louden; Grace M Lindsay; Allan Gaw
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  From altruism to monetisation: Australian women's ideas about money, ethics and research eggs.

Authors:  Catherine Waldby; Ian Kerridge; Margaret Boulos; Katherine Carroll
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Motivations for (non)participation in population-based health studies among the elderly - comparison of participants and nonparticipants of a prospective study on influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Manas K Akmatov; Leonhard Jentsch; Peggy Riese; Marcus May; Malik W Ahmed; Damaris Werner; Anja Rösel; Jana Prokein; Inga Bernemann; Norman Klopp; Blair Prochnow; Thomas Illig; Christoph Schindler; Carlos A Guzman; Frank Pessler
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Continuous glucose monitoring in older people with diabetes and memory problems: a mixed-methods feasibility study in the UK.

Authors:  Katharina Mattishent; Kathleen Lane; Charlotte Salter; Ketan Dhatariya; Helen M May; Sankalpa Neupane; Yoon K Loke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.