Christopher M Mulla1, David C Lieb2, Raymie McFarland3, Joseph A Aloi4. 1. Eastern Virginia Medical School, Department of Medicine, Norfolk, VA, USA. 2. Eastern Virginia Medical School, Department of Medicine, Strelitz Diabetes Center for Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Norfolk, VA, USA. 3. Glytec Systems, Greenville, SC, USA. 4. Eastern Virginia Medical School, Department of Medicine, Strelitz Diabetes Center for Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Norfolk, VA, USA aloija@evms.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study explores the relationship between education for inpatient diabetes providers and the utilization of insulin order sets, inpatient glucometrics, and length of stay in a large health care system. METHODS: The study included patients with and without the diagnosis of diabetes. An education campaign included provider-directed diabetes education administered via online learning modules and in-person presentations by trained individuals. Relationships among provider-attended diabetes education, order set usage, and inpatient glucometrics (hypo- and hyperglycemia) were analyzed, as well as length of stay. RESULTS: Insulin use knowledge scores for all providers averaged 52%, and improved significantly to 93% (P < .001) by the end of the education intervention period. Likewise utilization of electronic basal-bolus order sets increased from a baseline of 20% for patients receiving insulin to 86% within 6 weeks (P < .01) of introduction of order sets. During the study, the incidence of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia declined from 1.47% to 1.27% and from 23.21% to 17.80%, respectively. However, these improvements were not sustained beyond the completion of the education campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Education of diabetes health care providers was provided in a large, multihospital system through the use of online learning modules. Adoption of standardized insulin order sets was associated with an improvement in glucometrics. This educational and quality initiative resulted in overall improvements in insulin knowledge, adherence to recommended order sets, inpatient glucometrics, and patient length of stay. These improvements were not sustained, reinforcing the need for repeated educational interventions for those involved in providing inpatient diabetes care.
BACKGROUND: This study explores the relationship between education for inpatient diabetes providers and the utilization of insulin order sets, inpatient glucometrics, and length of stay in a large health care system. METHODS: The study included patients with and without the diagnosis of diabetes. An education campaign included provider-directed diabetes education administered via online learning modules and in-person presentations by trained individuals. Relationships among provider-attended diabetes education, order set usage, and inpatient glucometrics (hypo- and hyperglycemia) were analyzed, as well as length of stay. RESULTS:Insulin use knowledge scores for all providers averaged 52%, and improved significantly to 93% (P < .001) by the end of the education intervention period. Likewise utilization of electronic basal-bolus order sets increased from a baseline of 20% for patients receiving insulin to 86% within 6 weeks (P < .01) of introduction of order sets. During the study, the incidence of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia declined from 1.47% to 1.27% and from 23.21% to 17.80%, respectively. However, these improvements were not sustained beyond the completion of the education campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Education of diabetes health care providers was provided in a large, multihospital system through the use of online learning modules. Adoption of standardized insulin order sets was associated with an improvement in glucometrics. This educational and quality initiative resulted in overall improvements in insulin knowledge, adherence to recommended order sets, inpatient glucometrics, and patient length of stay. These improvements were not sustained, reinforcing the need for repeated educational interventions for those involved in providing inpatient diabetes care.
Authors: R Herring; C Pengilley; H Hopkins; B Tuthill; N Patel; C Nelson; A Currie; D L Russell-Jones Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Guillermo E Umpierrez; Dawn Smiley; Ariel Zisman; Luz M Prieto; Andres Palacio; Miguel Ceron; Alvaro Puig; Roberto Mejia Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-05-18 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Boris Draznin; Janice Gilden; Sherita H Golden; Silvio E Inzucchi; David Baldwin; Bruce W Bode; Jeffrey B Boord; Susan S Braithwaite; Enrico Cagliero; Kathleen M Dungan; Mercedes Falciglia; M Kathleen Figaro; Irl B Hirsch; David Klonoff; Mary T Korytkowski; Mikhail Kosiborod; Lillian F Lien; Michelle F Magee; Umesh Masharani; Gregory Maynard; Marie E McDonnell; Eti S Moghissi; Neda Rasouli; Daniel J Rubin; Robert J Rushakoff; Archana R Sadhu; Stanley Schwartz; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert A Vigersky; Cecilia C Low; Deborah J Wexler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Etie S Moghissi; Mary T Korytkowski; Monica DiNardo; Daniel Einhorn; Richard Hellman; Irl B Hirsch; Silvio E Inzucchi; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; M Sue Kirkman; Guillermo E Umpierrez Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Joseph Aloi; Bruce W Bode; Jagdeesh Ullal; Paul Chidester; Raymie S McFarland; Amy E Bedingfield; Melanie Mabrey; Robby Booth; April Mumpower; Amisha Wallia Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2016-09-25