Literature DB >> 25519265

The epidemiology of reoperations for orthopaedic trauma.

R C Barksfield1, R Coomber, K Woolf, A Prinja, D Wordsworth, D Lopez, S Burtt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) has issued guidance regarding the use of reoperation rates in the revalidation of UK-based orthopaedic surgeons. Currently, little has been published concerning acceptable rates of reoperation following primary surgical management of orthopaedic trauma, particularly with reference to revalidation.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing clearly defined reoperations following primary surgical management of trauma between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2011. A full case note review was undertaken to establish the demographics, clinical course and context of reoperation. A review of the imaging was performed to establish whether the procedure performed was in line with accepted trauma practice and whether the technical execution was acceptable.
RESULTS: A total of 3,688 patients underwent primary procedures within the time period studied while 70 (1.90%, 99% CI: 1.39-2.55) required an unplanned reoperation. Thirty-nine (56%) of these patients were male. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range: 18-98 years) and there was a median time to reoperation of 50 days (IQR: 13-154 days). Potentially avoidable reoperations occurred in 41 patients (58.6%, 99% CI: 43.2-72.6). This was largely due to technical errors (40 patients, 57.1%, 99% CI: 41.8-71.3), representing 1.11% (99% CI: 0.73-1.64) of the total trauma workload. Within RCS guidelines, 28-day reoperation rates for hip, wrist and ankle fractures were 1.4% (99% CI: 0.5-3.3), 3.5% (99% CI: 0.8%-12.1) and 1.86% (99% CI: 0.4-6.6) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We present novel work that has established baseline reoperation rates for index procedures required for revalidation of orthopaedic surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25519265      PMCID: PMC4473898          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X14055925059318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Zhiming Yang; Fuxing Pei; Fuguo Huang; Shiqiang Chen; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A qualitative exploration of the production of Hospital Episode Statistics in a Guernsey hospital: implications for regional comparisons of UK health data.

Authors:  Rosemary F Head; Allyson Byrom; George T H Ellison
Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res       Date:  2008-08

3.  Orthopaedic procedure coding. Does accuracy matter?

Authors:  Edward Britton; Charles Chambers; Alexander Ashmore
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2009

4.  Comparison of angle stable plate fixation approaches for distal radius fractures.

Authors:  S Matschke; A Wentzensen; D Ring; M Marent-Huber; L Audigé; J B Jupiter
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Reoperation for metalwork complications following the use of volar locking plates for distal radius fractures: a United Kingdom experience.

Authors:  A Sahu; C P Charalambous; S P Mills; S Batra; M J Ravenscroft
Journal:  Hand Surg       Date:  2011

6.  Complications following treatment of supination external rotation ankle fractures through the posterolateral approach.

Authors:  Milton T M Little; Marschall B Berkes; Lionel E Lazaro; Peter K Sculco; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Dual lag screw cephalomedullary nail versus the classic sliding hip screw for the stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G Kouvidis; V I Sakellariou; A F Mavrogenis; J Stavrakakis; D Kampas; J Galanakis; P J Papagelopoulos; P Katonis
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2012-10-20

8.  Lower reoperation rate for cemented hemiarthroplasty than for uncemented hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation following femoral neck fracture: 12- to 19-year follow-up of patients aged 75 years or more.

Authors:  Bjarke Viberg; Søren Overgaard; Jens Lauritsen; Ole Ovesen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Stable rates of operative treatment of distal radius fractures in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study (2004–2013)

Authors:  Kathleen A. Armstrong; Herbert P. von Schroeder; Nancy N. Baxter; Toni Zhong; Anjie Huang; Steven J. McCabe
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.