Literature DB >> 25519143

The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence.

Julia Kopeika1, Alan Thornhill2, Yacoub Khalaf3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation has been extensively used in assisted reproductive technology, agriculture and conservation programmes for endangered species. The literature reports largely positive results regarding the survival of frozen-thawed cells and clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether or not cryopreservation of sperm, oocytes and embryos causes any disruption in their genetic integrity. Drawing on the available published evidence, this review paper describes in detail the physical and biochemical factors of cryopreservation that could potentially affect genomic integrity.
METHODS: A critical review of the published literature using PubMed with particular emphasis on studies which include assessment of genetic stability after cryopreservation of oocyte, sperm and embryos. The search was performed in 2014 and covered the period from the beginning of electronic records until July 2014. No language restrictions were applied.
RESULTS: Cryopreservation is associated with extensive damage to cell membranes, and results in alteration of the functional and metabolic status of the cells and mitochondria. Some evidence suggests an increase in DNA single-strand breaks, and degree of DNA condensation or fragmentation in sperm after cryopreservation. The extent of these changes may vary between different individuals and different techniques. The addition of antioxidants to the cryopreservation media and the use of well-controlled cooling regimes could potentially improve such outcomes. Limited numbers of studies on oocytes provide controversial results regarding the effect on DNA fragmentation, sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and aneuploidy. The only study on human embryos suggested that vitrification affects DNA integrity to a much lesser extent than slow freezing. Animal studies show increases in mitochondrial DNA mutations in embryos after cryopreservation. The limited numbers of long-term follow-up studies in humans provide reassurance that derives mostly from retrospective studies with some methodological weaknesses.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an overview of studies performed to date on the effect of cryopreservation on the oocyte, sperm and embryos. Controversy of the reported data has highlighted the gaps in our knowledge not only for clinical studies, but also for basic research in human embryos. New perspectives for future research are proposed.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cryopreservation; embryos; genome; oocytes; sperm

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25519143     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  45 in total

1.  The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.

Authors:  N Kaartinen; K Kananen; H Huhtala; S Keränen; H Tinkanen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Sperm cryopreservation reduces offspring growth.

Authors:  David Nusbaumer; Lucas Marques da Cunha; Claus Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sperm parameters that play a major role in the assessment of semen quality after cryopreservation.

Authors:  A Palomar Rios; I Molina Botella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Does low-level laser therapy on degenerated ovine testes improve post-thawed sperm characteristics?

Authors:  Tamie Guibu de Almeida; Maíra Bianchi Rodrigues Alves; Leonardo Batissaco; Mariana Andrade Torres; André Furugen Cesar de Andrade; Rodolfo Daniel Mingoti; Rubens Paes de Arruda; Eneiva Carla Carvalho Celeghini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Increased risk of large-for-gestational age birthweight in singleton siblings conceived with in vitro fertilization in frozen versus fresh cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; James P Toner; Charles C Coddington
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Increased count, motility, and total motile sperm cells collected across three consecutive ejaculations within 24 h of oocyte retrieval: implications for management of men presenting with low numbers of motile sperm for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Al-Hasen Said; Michael L Reed
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Sperm preparation after freezing improves motile sperm count, motility, and viability in frozen-thawed sperm compared with sperm preparation before freezing-thawing process.

Authors:  A Palomar Rios; A Gascón; J V Martínez; S Balasch; I Molina Botella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Ovarian tissue cryopreservation in young females through the Oncofertility Consortium's National Physicians Cooperative.

Authors:  Austin G Armstrong; Bruce F Kimler; Brigid M Smith; Teresa K Woodruff; Mary Ellen Pavone; Francesca E Duncan
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 9.  Revisiting debates of premature luteinization and its effect on assisted reproductive technology outcome.

Authors:  Reda S Hussein; Ihab Elnashar; Ahmed F Amin; Hisham A Abou-Taleb; Ahmed M Abbas; Ahmed M Abdelmageed; Tarek Farghaly; Yulian Zhao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.