| Literature DB >> 25518035 |
Mehmet Aziret1, Oktay Irkorucu2, Enver Reyhan2, Hasan Erdem2, Koray Das2, Selvinaz Ozkara2, Ali Surmelioglu3, Selim Sozen4, Ilhan Bali4, Sulleyman Cetinkunar2, Kamuran Cumhur Deger2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Vardenafil enhances dilatation of vascular smooth muscle and inhibits platelet aggregation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of vardenafil and pentoxifylline administration in an experimental model of ischemic colitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25518035 PMCID: PMC4255201 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2014(11)10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
-Management of the ischemic colitis rat model.
| Groups | Operation | Procedure | Euthanasia | |
| Only laparotomy | Oral 10 mg/kg 0.9% NaCl at the same time for 3 days | Cervical dislocation with 50 mg/kg ketamine after 72 hours. | ||
| Laparotomy and IC model | Oral 10 mg/kg 0.9% NaCl at the same time for 3 days | |||
| Laparotomy and IC model | Oral 5 mg/kg vardenafil at the same time for 3 days | |||
| Laparotomy and IC model | Oral 10 mg/kg vardenafil at the same time for 3 days | |||
| Laparotomy and IC model | I.M. 50 mg/kg PTX at the same time for 3 days | |||
Figure 1Ischemic colitis model.
Figure 2Measurement of ischemic areas in the control group.
-Comparison of macroscopic damage between groups.
| Acidic liquid | Bowel dilatation | Serosal changes | Perforation | Adhesion | |||||||
| GROUPS | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | |
| 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | ||
| 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 100 | ||
| 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 62.5 | 37.5 | 0 | 100 | ||
| 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 6 | ||
| 62.5 | 37.5 | 75 | 25 | 75 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 75 | ||
| 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 6 | ||
| 75 | 25 | 62.5 | 37.5 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 75 | ||
| 8 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 | ||
| 100 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 37.5 | 62.5 | ||
| A-B (0,001), B-C (0.026), B- (0.007), B- (0.0001) | A-B (0.001), B-C (0.007), B-D (0.026), B-E (0.007) | A-B (0.0001), B-C (0.007), B-D, (0001), B- (0.0001) | A-B (0.201), B-C (0.201), B-D (0.201), B-E (0.201) | A- (0.467), B-C (0.467), B-D (0.467), B-E (0.201) | |||||||
-Comparisons of MDA, Wallace macroscopic damage scores and Chiu classification in rats.
| MDA (nmol/gr) | Wallace macroscopic damage scoring (MVD) | Chiu classification | Gomella ischemic areas (IAs) (mm2) | ||||||||||||
| Groups | n | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 8 | 18.0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 8 | 63.7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 63.3 | |
| 8 | 25.6 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9.6 | |
| 8 | 25.3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.4 | |
| 8 | 22.7 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.8 | |
| A-B, B-C, B-D, B-E ( | A-B (0.0001), A-C (0.003), A-D (0.003), A-E (0.009), B-C (0.003), B-D (0.001), B-E (0.001), C-D (0.679), C-E (0.424), D-E (0.602) | A-B (0.0001), A-C (0.003), A-D (0.009), A-E (0.009), B-C (0.006), B-D (0.001), B-E (0.001), C-D (0.424), C-E (0.424), D-E (0.333) | A-B, A-C, A-D, A-E, B-C, B-D, B-E | ||||||||||||
Figure 3Group histopathology. A. Common massive areas of epithelial detachment and presence of transmural necrosis. [“Chiu” classification grade 5] (H&E x40). B. Massive areas of epithelial detachment (shown with an arrow) [“Chiu” classification grade 3] (H&E x100). C. Subepithelial “Gruenhagen's space” (shown with an asterisk) and capillary congestion (shown with an arrow) [“Chiu” classification grade 1] (H&E x200). D. Area of mucosal ischemic necrosis (H&E x200).